2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.6162-08.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Roles of GABAA and GABAB Receptors in Balancing and Terminating Persistent Cortical Activity

Abstract: Cortical networks spontaneously fluctuate between persistently active Up states and quiescent Down states. The Up states are maintained by recurrent excitation within local circuits, and can be turned on and off by synaptic input. GABAergic inhibition is believed to be important for stabilizing such persistent activity by balancing the excitation, and could have an additional role in terminating the Up state. Here, we report that GABA A and GABA B receptor-mediated inhibition have distinct and complementary ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

40
206
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
40
206
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While co-antagonism of GABA A and GABA B receptors induced paroxysmal depolarizing shift, blocking either GABA A or GABA B receptors alone did not cause catastrophic depolarization. GABA A and GABA B receptors have a complementary role in reducing neural excitation (Mann et al, 2009). GZ significantly reduced conductance and reversed the anoxic depolarization; however, GABA B receptors might prevent the release of excitatory neurotransmitters and excitotoxic cell death even when GABA A receptors are inactive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While co-antagonism of GABA A and GABA B receptors induced paroxysmal depolarizing shift, blocking either GABA A or GABA B receptors alone did not cause catastrophic depolarization. GABA A and GABA B receptors have a complementary role in reducing neural excitation (Mann et al, 2009). GZ significantly reduced conductance and reversed the anoxic depolarization; however, GABA B receptors might prevent the release of excitatory neurotransmitters and excitotoxic cell death even when GABA A receptors are inactive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition controls the firing of regular-spiking neurons; inhibitory conductances are always larger than excitatory ones except before an action potential (Hasenstaub et al 2005;Rudolph et al 2007). Furthermore, GABA A conductances have been shown to be important to maintain activity within the network during the active state; the removal of this inhibition shortens the active state's duration and induces epileptiform burst (Mann et al 2009;Sanchez-Vives et al 2010). If inhibition controls the firing of neurons, a strong and synchronous recruitment of interneurons would have the consequence that inhibition would silence neurons and cause a disfacilitation resulting into a full silent state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up states have been observed both in vivo (Li et al 2009;Wilson and Kawaguchi 1996) and in vitro (McCormick et al 2003) and typically occur spontaneously. Up states in cortical pyramidal cells are due to intrinsic cortical dynamics but can be triggered by thalamic input (Maclean et al 2005) and are controlled in a complex manner by GABAergic inhibition (Mann et al 2009). It has been difficult to establish a clear link between Up states and external triggering events, and their function remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%