2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

49
252
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
49
252
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the right FFA shows complete position invariance, including ipsilateral peripheral sites. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies, using stimulus repetitionevoked fMRIa, which suggest an invariance of FFA to the face's position, size [45,46], spatial scale [51] and viewing angle [24].…”
Section: (B) Neurophysiologysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This suggests that the right FFA shows complete position invariance, including ipsilateral peripheral sites. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies, using stimulus repetitionevoked fMRIa, which suggest an invariance of FFA to the face's position, size [45,46], spatial scale [51] and viewing angle [24].…”
Section: (B) Neurophysiologysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lesions to this region can cause prosopagnosia 25 , the inability to recognize the identity of familiar individuals, while leaving the ability to detect the presence of a face intact. Numerous studies that have employed fMRI adaptation paradigms have demonstrated the sensitivity of the FFA to differences in face identity 21,[26][27][28][29][30] . In such paradigms the FFA shows a decreased response when one face stimulus is presented twice in rapid succession, when compared with the response when two novel stimuli are presented in the same manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In neurologically intact individuals, the fMRI response is larger for repeated presentations of faces of different identities compared with the same identity (e.g. [28,70,71]); this release from adaptation in right fusiform for different face identities has even been reported in patients with congenital (developmental) prosopagnosia [72]. Yet neither D.F.…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%