2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b04479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Reactivity of a Mononuclear Peroxocobalt(III) Species toward Activation of Nitriles

Abstract: A mononuclear side-on peroxocobalt(III) complex with a tetradentate macrocyclic ligand, [Co(TBDAP)(O)] (1), shows a novel and facile mode of dioxygenase-like reactivity with nitriles (R-C≡N; R = Me, Et, and Ph) to produce the corresponding mononuclear hydroximatocobalt(III) complexes, [Co(TBDAP)(R-C(═NO)O)], in which the nitrile moiety is oxidized by two oxygen atoms of the peroxo group. The overall reaction proceeds in one-pot under ambient conditions (ca. 1 h, 40 °C). O-Labeling experiments confirm that both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wavenumber of the O–O stretching vibration observed in the present study is typical for mononuclear side-on metal–peroxo complexes (metal = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu). , Judging from a well-established relationship between the wavenumber of the O–O stretching vibration of the mononuclear side-on metal dioxygen complexes and the associated O–O distance, the O–O distance of the Co III –peroxo species detected in the present study was estimated to be 1.39 Å (Figure ). This length is typical for a side-on metal–peroxo complex. , Other types of ROS can be eliminated from consideration on the basis of the ν O–O of 970 cm –1 ; this value is outside the range for ν O–O of cobalt–superoxo (1248–1135 cm –1 ), ν O–O of μ-peroxo dicobalt (800 cm –1 ), ν Co–O of bis­(μ-oxo) dicobalt (647–607 cm –1 ), , and ν Co–o of terminal cobalt–oxo (815–770 cm –1 ). , From these results, we can reasonably claim the formation of mononuclear side-on Co III –peroxo species within the zeolite pore via the two-electron reduction of O 2 by the mononuclear Co I species at room temperature. It is worth noting that this is the first example of the spectroscopic detection of a mononuclear metal–peroxo species derived from the O 2 activation by a metal-ion-doped zeolite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wavenumber of the O–O stretching vibration observed in the present study is typical for mononuclear side-on metal–peroxo complexes (metal = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu). , Judging from a well-established relationship between the wavenumber of the O–O stretching vibration of the mononuclear side-on metal dioxygen complexes and the associated O–O distance, the O–O distance of the Co III –peroxo species detected in the present study was estimated to be 1.39 Å (Figure ). This length is typical for a side-on metal–peroxo complex. , Other types of ROS can be eliminated from consideration on the basis of the ν O–O of 970 cm –1 ; this value is outside the range for ν O–O of cobalt–superoxo (1248–1135 cm –1 ), ν O–O of μ-peroxo dicobalt (800 cm –1 ), ν Co–O of bis­(μ-oxo) dicobalt (647–607 cm –1 ), , and ν Co–o of terminal cobalt–oxo (815–770 cm –1 ). , From these results, we can reasonably claim the formation of mononuclear side-on Co III –peroxo species within the zeolite pore via the two-electron reduction of O 2 by the mononuclear Co I species at room temperature. It is worth noting that this is the first example of the spectroscopic detection of a mononuclear metal–peroxo species derived from the O 2 activation by a metal-ion-doped zeolite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Previously established relationship between 1/(ν O–O ) 2/3 and R O–O for mononuclear side-on metal–O 2 complexes, i.e., R O–O = 70.7/(ν O–O ) 2/3 + 0.671 . For comparison, experimental data of the previously reported mononuclear metal–peroxo complexes (metal = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) are also included as red circles. , For cobalt peroxo complexes (refs and ), it was reported that the experimental errors of the R O–O value, which are attributed to the librational rotation of the peroxo ligand in the crystal, were exceedingly large; thus, only for the cobalt peroxo complexes, the computationally predicted R O–O were plotted instead of experimental data. ,, Blue arrows indicate the 1/(ν O–O ) 2/3 and R O–O obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The average Co-O bond length (2.034 A) in 1 is similar to that of the hydroxamatocobalt(II) complex with 6-(Me 2 Ph) 2 TPA ligand (2.038 A) 34 but is longer than that in 2 (1.856 A) and other hydroximatocobalt(III) complexes. 24,25,[27][28][29]35 1 is the rare example of a structurally characterized hydroxamatocobalt(II) complex, which would be a reactive species towards inhibition of metalloenzymes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which is derived from the reduction of [Co III (TBDAP)(CH 3 C(]NO)O)] + (2). 29 1 was characterized by X-ray crystallography and multiple spectroscopic methods. To the best of our knowledge, 1 represents a rare example of a structurally characterized cobalt(II) complex bearing an acetohydroxamate ligand that has been prepared by the reaction of a hydroximatocobalt(III) complex with a biological reductant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has shown that a peroxocobalt(III) complex can activate nitriles to form hydroximatocobalt(III) complexes via oxidation by the peroxo group while Lee and coworkers have activated nitriles using a Ni(II)-(2-mercaptophenyl)phosphine complex to form a thioiminium moiety by nucleophilic attack of a thiol. 29,30 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%