2021
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1599-21.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Progressions of Neuronal Activity Changes Underlie the Formation and Consolidation of a Gustatory Associative Memory

Abstract: Acquiring new memories is a multistage process. Numerous studies have convincingly demonstrated that initially acquired memories are labile and are stabilized only by later consolidation processes. These multiple phases of memory formation are known to involve modification of both cellular excitability and synaptic connectivity, which in turn change neuronal activity at both the single neuron and ensemble levels. However, the specific mapping between the known phases of memory and the changes in neuronal activ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to altering μ power, LiCl also significantly altered GC taste responses. This fact dovetails nicely with data presented by Arieli and colleagues [ 85 ], who examined how GC activity changes following CTA learning, identifying 2 types of impact resulting from the pairing of taste with LiCl-induced illness—an “immediate” impact of LiCl administration on taste responses in GC single neurons and a “delayed” impact on GC ensemble population dynamics in taste response. Arieli and colleagues hypothesized that the late impact is driven by CTA formation, and that the immediate impact is likely caused by the illness state induced by LiCl injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In addition to altering μ power, LiCl also significantly altered GC taste responses. This fact dovetails nicely with data presented by Arieli and colleagues [ 85 ], who examined how GC activity changes following CTA learning, identifying 2 types of impact resulting from the pairing of taste with LiCl-induced illness—an “immediate” impact of LiCl administration on taste responses in GC single neurons and a “delayed” impact on GC ensemble population dynamics in taste response. Arieli and colleagues hypothesized that the late impact is driven by CTA formation, and that the immediate impact is likely caused by the illness state induced by LiCl injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results indicate that taste experience specifically reduces the response variability during the palatability epoch-the epoch known to be critically impacted during CTA learning (Grossman et al, 2008;Moran and Katz, 2014;Arieli et al, 2022). Consistent with behavioral work showing enhanced learning with low conditioned stimulus variation (e.g., Jennings and Bonardi, 2017), the increase in across-trial reliability we see here may well make it easier for the rats to learn CTA.…”
Section: Latent Enhancement Of Cta Learning Following Benign Taste Ex...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Ensemble (neuron-to-neuron) response reliability during CTA conditioning. While many statistical algorithms have been applied to detect state transitions in neural spiking data (e.g., hidden Markov Modeling, Jones et al, 2007), here we used Bayesian Changepoint Analysis (BCA) to determine the presence of sudden, coherent firing-rate transitions in ensemble taste responses, which have been shown to exist in taste responses (Katz et al, 2001;Jones et al, 2007;Sadacca et al, 2012) and to be relevant to both naïve behavior (Li et al, 2016;Sadacca et al, 2016) and CTA learning (Grossman et al, 2008;Moran and Katz, 2014;Arieli et al, 2022). Unlike many other methods that provide a single point estimate through maximum likelihood estimation, we chose BCA because, as demonstrated below, it offers a distribution of parameter estimates.…”
Section: Analysis Of Electrophysiology Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first question, we can safely speculate that these oral signals are integral to flavor processing and behavioral responses, particularly in relation to consummatory behavior. The gustatory cortex has been implicated in functions related to taste processing (Katz et al, 2001; Blonde et al, 2015; Sadacca et al, 2012), taste learning (Schier et al, 2016; Kayyal et al, 2021; Yiannakas et al, 2021; Arieli et al, 2022) and expectation (Samuelsen et al, 2012; Gardner and Fontanini, 2014; Vincis and Fontanini, 2016; Livneh et al, 2017), but also in taste-based decision making (Mukherjee et al, 2019; Vincis et al, 2020), highlighting its role not only in sensory processing, but also in modulating consummatory behaviors. Therefore, encoding oral thermal signals by the GC could help improve the fidelity of food evaluation processes, integrating temperature as a crucial parameter in evaluating food quality and palatability (Zellner et al, 1988; Moskowitz, 1973; Torregrossa et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%