1978
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91158-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct nuclear genes for yeast mitochondrial and cytoplasmic methionyl-tRNA synthetases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present studies confirm earlier biochemical evidence that the mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic methionyl-tRNA synthetases of yeast are products of two separate nuclear genes [31]. The inability of mitochondrial extracts obtained from two different msml mutants to catalyze the acylation of both the elongator and initiator methionyl-tRNAs indicates that as in prokaryotic systems [32], both isoacceptors are charged by the same enzyme.…”
Section: Sequence Of the Msml Genesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The present studies confirm earlier biochemical evidence that the mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic methionyl-tRNA synthetases of yeast are products of two separate nuclear genes [31]. The inability of mitochondrial extracts obtained from two different msml mutants to catalyze the acylation of both the elongator and initiator methionyl-tRNAs indicates that as in prokaryotic systems [32], both isoacceptors are charged by the same enzyme.…”
Section: Sequence Of the Msml Genesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To conclude, we emphasize that transformation to prototrophy of our yeast Km mutant could be due to the cloning of either cytoplasmic or mitochondrial methionyl-tRNA synthetase genes because both belong to the nuclear genome and both enzymes aminoacylate cytoplasmic tRNA (18). However, the two enzymes can be distinguished on the basis of two criteria (18): (i) their chromatographic behavior on hydroxyapatite columns, the mitochondrial enzyme being eluted at 0.1 M phosphate and the cytoplasmic one at 0.2 M; and (ii) the specificity of aminoacylation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two enzymes can be distinguished on the basis of two criteria (18): (i) their chromatographic behavior on hydroxyapatite columns, the mitochondrial enzyme being eluted at 0.1 M phosphate and the cytoplasmic one at 0.2 M; and (ii) the specificity of aminoacylation. Indeed, mitochondrial methionyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates both yeast cytoplasmic and E. coli tRNA at similar rates whereas its cytoplasmic counterpart aminoacylates E. coli tRNA at a rate 1/7th that of yeast cytoplasmic tRNA (18). We recently have found that antibodies raised against the purified gene product do not inhibit the mitochondrial methionyl-tRNA synthetase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, elongator tRNAMet from rabbit liver has been reported not to bind MTSEC better than a non-Met tRNA (17). In addition, yeast mitochondrial and wheat germ chloroplastic MTS aminoacylate as efficiently E. coli tRNAsMet as their cognate tRNAs (20)(21)(22). Finally, eukaryotic cytoplasmic MTS aminoacylate the mitochondrial, choroplastic and E.coli tRNAsMet with a low efficiency (20-22) whereas mammalian cytoplasmic MTS efficiently aminoacylates cytoplasmic tRNAMet from yeast (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%