2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct neural correlates underlying two- and three-dimensional mental rotations using three-dimensional objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both OBTtasks led to strong bilateral activation of parietal cortex. This is concordant with activations at this site observed in most studies investigating the neural correlates of mental imagery of bodily stimuli (Bonda et al 1995;Kosslyn et al 1998;Zacks et al 1999;Creem et al 2001;de Jong et al 2001;Lenggenhager et al 2006), but also non-corporeal objects (Pegna et al 1997;Harris and Miniussi 2003;Vingerhoets et al 2001;Alivisatos and Petrides 1997;Carpenter et al 1999;Kawamichi et al 2007).…”
Section: Parietal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Both OBTtasks led to strong bilateral activation of parietal cortex. This is concordant with activations at this site observed in most studies investigating the neural correlates of mental imagery of bodily stimuli (Bonda et al 1995;Kosslyn et al 1998;Zacks et al 1999;Creem et al 2001;de Jong et al 2001;Lenggenhager et al 2006), but also non-corporeal objects (Pegna et al 1997;Harris and Miniussi 2003;Vingerhoets et al 2001;Alivisatos and Petrides 1997;Carpenter et al 1999;Kawamichi et al 2007).…”
Section: Parietal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2) increased linearly with increasing amount of mental rotation, during both implicit and explicit motor imagery, for the affected as well as for the unaffected limb. This same parieto-premotor network has also been isolated in earlier studies using similar imagery paradigms (de Lange et al, 2005;Ecker et al, 2006;Johnson et al, 2002a;Kawamichi et al, 2007;Lamm et al, 2007;Richter et al, 2000), as well as during the selection and preparation of actual hand movements (Rushworth et al, 2003;Thoenissen et al, 2002;Toni et al, 1999). The matched contribution of these motor regions to implicit and explicit imagery suggests that both tasks evoked motor simulation of hand actions to a similar degree, and that, as far as the motor system is concerned, explicit and implicit motor imagery were indistinguishable.…”
Section: Motor Simulation and Action Monitoring In Cpsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Neuroimaging methods with higher spatial resolution (like fMRI) have, however, been divided on the issue. While several studies have observed (attenuated) M1 activity during imagery (Dechent et al, 2004;Lacourse et al, 2005;Lotze et al, 1999;Porro et al, 1996;Rodriguez et al, 2004) other studies did not find any M1 activation as a function of imagery, but only M1 activity related to the actual motor response at the end of a trial (de Lange et al, 2005;Richter et al, 2000). Possibly, a host of factors like paradigm choice (e.g., implicit or explicit, simple or complex movements), and subject instructions may contribute to whether or not M1 plays a role during motor imagery (Lotze and Halsband, 2006).…”
Section: Motor Imagery In Healthy Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case of visual stimuli with a three-dimensional (3D) object, during 3D rotation higher activities are observed from 200 to 300 ms in the left dorsal premotor (PMd), and from 400 to 700 ms in the right PMd [Kawamichi et al, 2004[Kawamichi et al, , 2007a. These results suggest that the left PMd is related to primary motor control, whereas the right PMd plays a supplementary role during mental stimulation.…”
Section: Magnetoencephalography (Meg)mentioning
confidence: 99%