2021
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Ground Reaction Forces in Gait between the Paretic and Non-Paretic Leg of Stroke Patients: A Paradigm for Innovative Physiotherapy Intervention

Abstract: This case report study aims to identify the differences in the ground reaction forces (GRF) placed on the forefoot, hindfoot, and entire foot between the paretic and non-paretic legs in two stroke patients to identify potential targets for improved physiotherapy treatment. A digital gait analysis foot pressure insole was fitted inside the participants’ shoes to measure the percentage of body weight taken during the stance phase, and the vertical GRF of the two subjects are reported in this paper. Both patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gold standard for quantitative gait analysis implies the usage of high cost, space, and time-consuming 3D motion capture systems and force platforms [ 26 , 27 ]. Recently, the development of wearable technology enabled the usage of alternative low-cost approaches for gait assessment based on inertial measurement units (IMU) and ground reaction force (GRF) sensors [ 28 , 29 ]. These portable, wireless systems are suitable for clinical and home monitoring [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for quantitative gait analysis implies the usage of high cost, space, and time-consuming 3D motion capture systems and force platforms [ 26 , 27 ]. Recently, the development of wearable technology enabled the usage of alternative low-cost approaches for gait assessment based on inertial measurement units (IMU) and ground reaction force (GRF) sensors [ 28 , 29 ]. These portable, wireless systems are suitable for clinical and home monitoring [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%