2005
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.79.20.12667-12673.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Functional Sites for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1α on CXCR4 Transmembrane Helical Domains

Abstract: The entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into the cell is initiated by the interaction of the viral surface envelope protein with two cell surface components of the target cell, CD4 and a chemokine coreceptor, usually CXCR4 or CCR5. The natural ligand of CXCR4 is stromal cell-derived factor 1␣ (SDF-1␣). Whereas the overlap between HIV-1 and SDF-1␣ functional sites on the extracellular domains of CXCR4 has been well documented, it has yet to be determined whether there are sites in the transmemb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
140
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that we have tested various strains of gp120, including both X4-and R5-preferring gp120, and found that many of them caused neurotoxicity in RCCs. 3 Although the possibility remains that these CXCR4-specific SMM-chemokines could activate other known or unknown signaling pathways, the importance of steric hindrance in their neuroprotective mechanism is further supported by our mutational analysis of their binding sites, which shows overlap in the CXCR4 binding residues of these SMM-chemokines with X4-preferring gp120 but not with SDF-1␣ (48,49). Another mechanism whereby CCR5-selective ligands could suppress the neuroprotective action of these new CXCR4 antagonists would be heterologous desensitization (50,51), but such an effect need not be invoked here because the CCR5 ligands RCP188, RCP189, and gp120 BAL are neurotoxic on their own.…”
Section: Mechanism(s) By Which Antagonist Ccr5-selective Smm-mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Note that we have tested various strains of gp120, including both X4-and R5-preferring gp120, and found that many of them caused neurotoxicity in RCCs. 3 Although the possibility remains that these CXCR4-specific SMM-chemokines could activate other known or unknown signaling pathways, the importance of steric hindrance in their neuroprotective mechanism is further supported by our mutational analysis of their binding sites, which shows overlap in the CXCR4 binding residues of these SMM-chemokines with X4-preferring gp120 but not with SDF-1␣ (48,49). Another mechanism whereby CCR5-selective ligands could suppress the neuroprotective action of these new CXCR4 antagonists would be heterologous desensitization (50,51), but such an effect need not be invoked here because the CCR5 ligands RCP188, RCP189, and gp120 BAL are neurotoxic on their own.…”
Section: Mechanism(s) By Which Antagonist Ccr5-selective Smm-mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…One of these CXCR4 residues, W94 2.60 , is highly conserved among chemokine receptors, has been implicated in binding the small molecule antagonist IT1t and vMIP-II (8,9), and the equivalent residue in the chemokine receptor CCR5 (W86 2.60 ) has also been shown to play a role in ligand binding (24). Additional signal initiator residues identified in our screen include Y45 1.39 , Y116 3.32 , and E288 7.39 , all previously reported as binding and/ or signaling determinants in CXCR4 (13,19,22,25). In the CXCR4:CXCL12 complex model, each of these four residues directly contacts or is in close proximity to the distal N terminus of CXCL12 (residues K1 and P2), which is widely recognized as the critical domain of the chemokine that initiates signaling (16,26).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Three of these critical residues are buried directly below the CXCR4 signal initiator residues discussed above. These residues are F292 7.43 , which has been previously shown to be important for CXCR4 activity (17,19), A291 7.42 , which has a known role in introducing constitutive activity in CCR5 (27), and W252 6.48 , which is part of the well-characterized CWxP rotamer motif (28,29). Homologous positions in the A2AR structure (H278 7.43 and S277 7.42 ) have been shown to move closer to helix III upon agonist binding (30), supporting an important role for these residues in GPCR signal transmission.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with the findings in the present study, the D97A, D187A, and E288A mutations have previously been found to affect both the binding and signaling of CXCL12. 37,[45][46][47][48][49] Moreover, Trp 94 and Tyr 116 , together with the three aforementioned residues, have been implicated as part of "site two" in the "two-site model" for binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4. 33,45,50,51 Additionally, the direct interaction of Tyr 116 with agonists has been suggested in activation of GPCRs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%