2014
DOI: 10.1111/epi.12670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct functional and structural MRI abnormalities in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with and without hippocampal sclerosis

Abstract: SUMMARYObjective: We aimed to investigate patterns of electroencephalography-correlated functional MRI (EEG-fMRI) and subtle structural abnormalities in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) or normal MRI (MTLE-NL). Methods: We evaluated EEG-fMRI acquisition of the 25 patients with diagnosis of MTLE who had interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in the intra-MRI EEG: 13 MTLE-HS and 12 MTLE-NL. fMRI was performed using echo-planar images in a 3T MRI coupled w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, contrary to the mTLE group, the healthy subjects engaged the right PCC and precuneus along with bilateral medial frontal gyrus, and bilateral inferior parietal lobule (IPL) as connector hubs, which are important areas from the DMN (Buckner et al, 2009; Mevel et al, 2013; Persson et al, 2007). In this study, subjects with mTLE were not engaging the majority of the expected regions as main hubs, especially the PCC and precuneus, which coincides with previous publications that found disrupted DMN in mTLE patients (Coan et al, 2014; Liao et al, 2010; McCormick et al, 2013). Along with the lack of recruitment of most DMN-related regions as hubs, mTLE participants presented four regions from the cerebellum as connector hubs in the network while controls only presented two cerebellar regions only as provincial hubs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, contrary to the mTLE group, the healthy subjects engaged the right PCC and precuneus along with bilateral medial frontal gyrus, and bilateral inferior parietal lobule (IPL) as connector hubs, which are important areas from the DMN (Buckner et al, 2009; Mevel et al, 2013; Persson et al, 2007). In this study, subjects with mTLE were not engaging the majority of the expected regions as main hubs, especially the PCC and precuneus, which coincides with previous publications that found disrupted DMN in mTLE patients (Coan et al, 2014; Liao et al, 2010; McCormick et al, 2013). Along with the lack of recruitment of most DMN-related regions as hubs, mTLE participants presented four regions from the cerebellum as connector hubs in the network while controls only presented two cerebellar regions only as provincial hubs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One possible factor involved on RSN disruption in MTLE patients may be the underlying interictal activity. Although we do not have concomitant EEG recordings to this data, previous studies described the functional alterations caused by interictal spikes [Coan et al, 2014a]. However, there is no evidence that the characteristics of interictal epileptiform discharges, including rate, localization or extent, differ between right or left MTLE and, accordingly, these differences were also not observed between our groups of patients.…”
Section: Differences Of Abnormal Connectivity Between Right and Left mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…45 These differences would increase variability in the presented work. However, fMRI activation resulting from interictal spikes have been detected in the ipsilateral anterior temporal lobe and insula in both patients with and without hippocampal sclerosis, 46 and thalamic volume loss was also measured in both types of patients. 47 This suggests that our choice of an ipsilateral epileptogenic network including the hippocampus, insula, and thalamus is appropriate for all patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%