2020
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct differences in anterior chamber configuration and peripheral aberrations in negative dysphotopsia

Abstract: Ray tracing results for the analysis shown in Figure 6 but with eye-models as defined by Holliday and Simpson.⁸ A: Eye-model with an acrylic IOL. B: Eye-model with a silicone IOL. The results show similar asymmetries as the results shown in Figure 6, however with a different magnitude of asymmetry due to the difference in eye-model and IOL design. These results indicate that the observed changes in peripheral refraction are not dependent on IOL design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can cause a shadow-like region that goes away as the pupil opens up. This is consistent with clinical reports, but there is still no clear consensus about the cause [6][7][8][9]. The dark shadow evaluations indicate that the limit of the visual field may be reduced for the pseudophakic eye due to vignetting, which is very unexpected after 50 years of IOL usage with nobody mentioning it, though "far peripheral vision" seems to have never been explored in detail, even for the phakic eye [1].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This can cause a shadow-like region that goes away as the pupil opens up. This is consistent with clinical reports, but there is still no clear consensus about the cause [6][7][8][9]. The dark shadow evaluations indicate that the limit of the visual field may be reduced for the pseudophakic eye due to vignetting, which is very unexpected after 50 years of IOL usage with nobody mentioning it, though "far peripheral vision" seems to have never been explored in detail, even for the phakic eye [1].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Based on the reported clinical differences between eyes with and without ND, 2 eye models were designed, 1 with a typical anatomy for patients with ND and 1 with a typical anatomy for pseudophakic controls (Figure 1). 7,18 The anatomical aspects of these eye models were derived from clinical measurements obtained from 37 patients with ND and 26 pseudophakic controls who participated in the ESCRS vRESPOND study (CCMO registry number: NL58358.058.16). Before participation, all subjects provided written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the pupil center of the ND model was moved 0.17 mm temporally about the visual axis, while the pupil center of the control model was shifted 0.01 mm nasally. 7 As ND has been reported to occur with a wide variety of posterior chamber IOL designs, each eye model was analyzed with 4 different IOL designs (Figure 1, C). 7,8 The first design consisted of a simple biconvex IOL design, similar to those used in earlier ray-tracing studies.…”
Section: Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Negative dysphotopsia 38,41 Most commonly Secondary to the capsule overlying the nasal edge of the optic of the implant. Symptoms typically resolve with time, but may take 6 months or longer.…”
Section: Complication Symptom(s) Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%