2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Cortical-Thalamic-Striatal Circuits through the Parafascicular Nucleus

Abstract: Highlights d Mouse PF has the highest density of striatum-projecting neurons in subcortex d In PF, neurons are anatomically, transcriptionally, and physiologically organized d Cortical-PF-cortical and cortical-PF-striatum circuit motifs are revealed d PF is organized as parallel and independent limbic, associative, and somatosensory circuits

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This included substantial differences between motor and visual thalamus, where potentially corresponding anatomical differences have recently also been found. For example, layer 5 inputs from frontal cortex to VM (secondary motor thalamus) are now thought to be at least partly closed-loop, enabling maintenance of persistent activity, while inputs from visual cortex to LP (secondary visual thalamus) are thought to be open-loop, allowing information exchange between different areas [39][40][41] . Thalamic neuronal identities are thus defined by a combination of projection target and profile information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included substantial differences between motor and visual thalamus, where potentially corresponding anatomical differences have recently also been found. For example, layer 5 inputs from frontal cortex to VM (secondary motor thalamus) are now thought to be at least partly closed-loop, enabling maintenance of persistent activity, while inputs from visual cortex to LP (secondary visual thalamus) are thought to be open-loop, allowing information exchange between different areas [39][40][41] . Thalamic neuronal identities are thus defined by a combination of projection target and profile information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by the dense projection of medial M2 to visual areas (Attinger et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2016Zhang et al, , 2014, and reciprocal connections with visual cortex, retrosplenial cortex (Yamawaki et al, 2016) and the lateral posterior nucleus of the thalamus, among other brain structures, for inflow and outflow of visuo-spatial information. The BG also admit a functional subdivision-typically defined into motor, associative and limbic-which is preserved in the STN and the hyperdirect pathway (Alexander et al, 1986;Bolam et al, 2000;Hamani et al, 2004;Hintiryan et al, 2016;Hooks et al, 2018;Mandelbaum et al, 2019). STN receives projections from most of frontal cortex, and the medial M2 area then corresponds to the associative subdivision of the BG and STN, ideal for visuomotor transformation and integration.…”
Section: The Behavior Suggests a Sudden Switch In Locomotion Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a pathway from the PPN to the striatum has been reported, and interestingly consists of cholinergic and glutamatergic afferents that target striatal CINs (Dautan et al, 2014, 2016; Assous et al, 2019). Similarly, inputs from the parafascicular nucleus to the striatum form a topographic map and have also been shown to target CINs (Mandelbaum et al, 2019). Whilst extra-striatal sources of innervation onto CINs have been determined, whether they differently target and influence CIN subtypes is not known.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity May Lead To Functional Subgroups In Cholinmentioning
confidence: 99%