1990
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90394-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct classes of transcriptional activating domains function by different mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

16
263
3
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
16
263
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observations reported in Table 2 are consistent with the hypothesis that the AAM dimer, RelA, and VP16 can all interact with, and compete for, a common cellular cofactor(s), i.e., that these activation domains are mechanistically similar (29,35,46). As a more rigorous test of this hypothesis, we have taken advantage of the finding that acidic activators of the VP16 type are characterized by a high degree of dependence on the expression of ADA2, a putative transcriptional adaptor protein, for biological activity in yeast cells (3).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observations reported in Table 2 are consistent with the hypothesis that the AAM dimer, RelA, and VP16 can all interact with, and compete for, a common cellular cofactor(s), i.e., that these activation domains are mechanistically similar (29,35,46). As a more rigorous test of this hypothesis, we have taken advantage of the finding that acidic activators of the VP16 type are characterized by a high degree of dependence on the expression of ADA2, a putative transcriptional adaptor protein, for biological activity in yeast cells (3).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…While TFIIB has been clearly implicated as a target for VP16, evidence also indicates that VP16 can affect initiation complex assembly at steps subsequent to TFIIB recruitment (5). Finally, squelching experiments strongly suggest that different classes of activators also require specific cofactors that do not form part of the basal transcriptional machinery (12,29,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CBF5 mRNA is elevated compared to the wild type under permissive conditions, and the protein is likely to be overexpressed. We speculate that this overexpression leads to a form of squelching, a phenomenon well known from transcription studies (e.g., see Gill and Ptashne 1988;Tasset et al 1990;Flanagan et al 1991). Squelching often results from the overexpression of a free form of a component that normally functions in a complex with other proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%