2019
DOI: 10.3390/pr7090580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct and Quantitative Validation Method for Predictive Process Modelling in Preparative Chromatography of Synthetic and Bio-Based Feed Mixtures Following a Quality-by-Design (QbD) Approach

Abstract: Process development, especially in regulated industries, where quality-by-design approaches have become a prerequisite, is cost intensive and time consuming. A main factor is the large number of experiments needed. Process modelling can reduce this number significantly by replacing experiments with simulations. However, this requires a validated model. In this paper, a process and model development workflow is presented, which focuses on implementing, parameterizing, and validating the model in four steps. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other models, which are verified and validated with this process model development workflow, summarised schematically in Figure 3, cover a solid-liquid (phyto-) extraction [12], upstream fermentation [15], liquid-liquid extraction [16], continuous single-pass tangential flow filtration [17], precipitation [18] and chromatography [19]. This demonstrates the benefit of a methodical approach to model development.…”
Section: Impact Occurrence Commentmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Other models, which are verified and validated with this process model development workflow, summarised schematically in Figure 3, cover a solid-liquid (phyto-) extraction [12], upstream fermentation [15], liquid-liquid extraction [16], continuous single-pass tangential flow filtration [17], precipitation [18] and chromatography [19]. This demonstrates the benefit of a methodical approach to model development.…”
Section: Impact Occurrence Commentmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The processes reported in literature and the process framework depicted in this work are both summarized in Figure 4. For this total pDNA to mRNA process, a digital twin is proposed based on literature data, pre-existing knowledge and experimental experience as well as existing basically validated process models [41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Mrna Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done since for more sophisticated adsorption models such as competitive Langmuir or steric mass action (SMA), as a bigger data set for parameter determination is required [65,66]. Langmuir, however, has shown for different target molecules an accurate description of adsorption for different working groups [44,67,68].…”
Section: Purification With Adsorption Monolithsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Delump the effluent from the reactor to build the fractionator. (5) Test the effectiveness of the model by comparing the model results with actual plant data.…”
Section: Workflow Of Developing An Integrated Residue Hydrogenation Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since vacuum residue accounts for about half of the crude oil, more attention has been focused on vacuum residue hydroconversion processes, which are capable of converting heavy, inferior petroleum into light, valuable products such as gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel [3,4]. A good process model is important for monitoring the plant-level operation status, optimizing operating conditions, verifying the dynamic adjustment scheme, and maximizing the profit [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%