2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Activities of Myf5 and MyoD Indicate Separate Roles in Skeletal Muscle Lineage Specification and Differentiation

Abstract: SUMMARY Most transcription factor families contain highly related paralogs generated by gene duplication and functional divergence is generally accomplished by activation of distinct sets of genes by each member. Here we compare the molecular functions of Myf5 and MyoD, two highly related bHLH transcription factors that regulate skeletal muscle specification and differentiation. We find that MyoD and Myf5 bind the same sites genome-wide but have distinct functions: Myf5 induces histone acetylation without Pol … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
86
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
11
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The myogenic transcriptional activity of MRFs is also not equivalent, as showed by the role of Myogenin and Myf6 in the later stages of myocyte differentiation [1719], while Myf5 and MyoD play a major role in myoblasts determination [20]. Interestingly, Myf5 and MyoD also differ on their capability to remodel chromatin and recruit RNA polymerase II [21]. The complexity of the skeletal myogenic program is also highlighted by the complex regulatory regions driving the expression of these transcription factors, with the Myf5–Myf6 and MyoD loci representing the most well characterized [22].…”
Section: Skeletal Myogenesis In the Embryomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The myogenic transcriptional activity of MRFs is also not equivalent, as showed by the role of Myogenin and Myf6 in the later stages of myocyte differentiation [1719], while Myf5 and MyoD play a major role in myoblasts determination [20]. Interestingly, Myf5 and MyoD also differ on their capability to remodel chromatin and recruit RNA polymerase II [21]. The complexity of the skeletal myogenic program is also highlighted by the complex regulatory regions driving the expression of these transcription factors, with the Myf5–Myf6 and MyoD loci representing the most well characterized [22].…”
Section: Skeletal Myogenesis In the Embryomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinatorial composition of subunits within chromatin remodeling complexes of the SWI/SNF family has an important role in the modulation of the activity of these ATP-dependent enzymes (reviewed by [144]), and inclusion of BAF60C in these complexes during gastrulation may be associated with chromatin remodeling of specific sites important for mesodermal patterning. Although there are no genome wide studies validating the function of BAF60C at MYOD sites, studies from the Tapscott lab demonstrated that both Myf5 and MyoD bind similar loci and induce chromatin remodeling through an increase in acetyl-histone 4 (H4Ac) levels [21, 101], but only MyoD binding is associated with recruitment of RNA pol II and robust transcription. In addition, the Dynlacht group showed that MyoD also binds at skeletal muscle enhancers, and that this is associated with maintenance of monomethyl-lysine 4 histone 3 (H3K4me1) levels [145].…”
Section: Requirement Of a Mesodermal Intermediate And Differences mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the earliest stages of myoblast differentiation, promoters controlling the expression of differentiation-specific genes become hyperacetylated in a MyoD- or Myf5-dependent manner (46, 60, 61). This is accomplished by downregulation of Snail, HDACs and Ezh2 levels and the alleviation of repression of acetyltransferase activity (22, 24, 62, 63).…”
Section: The Chromatin State At Active Myogenic Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High MyoD expression in muscle satellite cells represses cell renewal and promotes terminal differentiation [10]. MyoD family inhibitor ( MDFI ) functions as a negative regulator of muscle growth by inhibiting muscle hypertrophy [11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%