2017 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/peci.2017.7935765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distilling provider-independent data for general detection of non-technical losses

Abstract: Abstract-Non-technical losses (NTL) in electricity distribution are caused by different reasons, such as poor equipment maintenance, broken meters or electricity theft. NTL occurs especially but not exclusively in emerging countries. Developed countries, even though usually in smaller amounts, have to deal with NTL issues as well. In these countries the estimated annual losses are up to six billion USD. These facts have directed the focus of our work to the NTL detection. Our approach is composed of two steps:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is that detection of frauds may have explanatory variables other than the energy consumption time series not considered in this work. As a matter of comparison, [9] achieves AUC of 0.729 using random forests and handcrafted feature engineering. Their dataset is similar to the one used in this work, although being bigger, filtered and preprocessed differently, without sliding evaluations performed.…”
Section: Settings and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation is that detection of frauds may have explanatory variables other than the energy consumption time series not considered in this work. As a matter of comparison, [9] achieves AUC of 0.729 using random forests and handcrafted feature engineering. Their dataset is similar to the one used in this work, although being bigger, filtered and preprocessed differently, without sliding evaluations performed.…”
Section: Settings and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on NTL detection has employed different approaches, types of inputs and dataset sizes. For instance, [9] focuses on feature engineering with random forest, logistic regression and support vector machine as classifiers. A survey on this field is presented in [5], citing also other approaches based on fuzzy systems, genetic algorithms, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed approach deals with the situation where there are only a small number of labeled samples. There are different fashion of detecting NTL among these work, for example, classification based [6,7,23,25], statistical analysis based [4,5], clustering based [24] or merely judgements with threshold values [3]. Most of these work took the advantage of the abundance of customer type labels.…”
Section: 3discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature selection is an important task for the identification of NTL. In Meira et al (2017), the features are divided into four categories with respect to time, geography, similarity of consumption profile and infrastructure. Random forest, logistic regression and SVM are tested with different proportion of NTL ranging from 10 to 90% across all four categories.…”
Section: Hybrid Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%