2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distilling Heterogeneity of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Database Using Latent Profile Analysis

Abstract: Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, LPA is based on specific mixture models 25 that analyze the joint distribution of a set of continuous observed variables (neuropsychological test z scores in this study) as a function of a finite and mutually exclusive and exhaustive number of unobserved components (mixtures) using a latent categorical variable or profile. 26,27 In this study, the latent variable was a profile of cognitive functioning in patients with MS. It should be noted that LPA does not necessitate any a priori categorization of the observed variables or indicators, thus facilitating a more granular examination of heterogeneity within and between latent-level groupings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, LPA is based on specific mixture models 25 that analyze the joint distribution of a set of continuous observed variables (neuropsychological test z scores in this study) as a function of a finite and mutually exclusive and exhaustive number of unobserved components (mixtures) using a latent categorical variable or profile. 26,27 In this study, the latent variable was a profile of cognitive functioning in patients with MS. It should be noted that LPA does not necessitate any a priori categorization of the observed variables or indicators, thus facilitating a more granular examination of heterogeneity within and between latent-level groupings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute a personalized composite, the actual cognitive change rates with faster tau-PET-predicted decline were weighted higher than actual change rates with slower tau-PET-predicted cognitive decline. Such patient-specific cognitive composites take into account inter-individual variability to facilitate longitudinal assessment of heterogeneous cognitive trajectories [ 47 49 ] and may thus be applied as personalized endpoints in clinical trials [ 7 , 19 ]. Supporting this, we exploratorily performed simulated trials in which tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites increased the sensitivity to detect treatment effects compared to conventional composites, which have been previously used as endpoints in clinical trials [ 8 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a mixedeffect regression-the standard analysis of this type of data-would identify one single trajectory per test that represents the "average" pattern of decline (Salthouse 2019), model-based clustering discovers multiple patterns of decline that are statistically different. The use of this approach to discover patterns of cognitive decline is growing, and it is proving to be useful for stratification of risk of cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's (Blanken et al 2020;Lee et al 2018). To assess the clinical and biological value of the patterns of change discovered with this analysis, we annotated the patterns by their correlation with patients' medical history, medications, circulating biomarkers, genetic markers, and changes of other aging traits and clinical status over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%