2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7575280
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distant Supervision with Transductive Learning for Adverse Drug Reaction Identification from Electronic Medical Records

Abstract: Information extraction and knowledge discovery regarding adverse drug reaction (ADR) from large-scale clinical texts are very useful and needy processes. Two major difficulties of this task are the lack of domain experts for labeling examples and intractable processing of unstructured clinical texts. Even though most previous works have been conducted on these issues by applying semisupervised learning for the former and a word-based approach for the latter, they face with complexity in an acquisition of initi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the articles reporting performing internal validation on their models, seven (24.1%) reported k-fold cross validation [ 32 , 35 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 52 ] and 11 (37.9%) reported using a holdout validation set [ 39 , 42 44 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 54 , 57 – 59 ]. The need for external validation was mentioned by five articles (17.2%) [ 31 , 41 , 45 , 49 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the articles reporting performing internal validation on their models, seven (24.1%) reported k-fold cross validation [ 32 , 35 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 52 ] and 11 (37.9%) reported using a holdout validation set [ 39 , 42 44 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 54 , 57 – 59 ]. The need for external validation was mentioned by five articles (17.2%) [ 31 , 41 , 45 , 49 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we utilized data with class labels, however, semisupervised learning or transductive learning methods are attracting attention these days. In future, researchers are encouraged to implement these methods for MI classification and information for these methods can be found in [ 58 , 59 ]. It is also worth mentioning that here, in the present study, we focused on at most three classes and presented the results in Table 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre as atividades clínicas dos farmacêuticos abordadas nos estudos, a revisão da farmacoterapia já é o método padrão-ouro e um ponto-chave na prevenção de potenciais RAM 19 . Entretanto, as aplicações de ML focadas na identificação de RAM, estão se expandindo sem a presença do farmacêutico como especialista no desenvolvimento/ validação dos modelos ou sem o uso de dados sob o cuidado direto ao paciente [20][21][22][23][24] , por este motivo alguns estudos foram excluídos desta revisão.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified