1997
DOI: 10.1086/118365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance to the Coma Cluster and a Value for HO Inferred from Globular Clusters in IC 4051

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Papers I and II of our series on the Coma cluster (Kavelaars et al 2000;Harris et al 2000), we discussed the GCS in NGC 4874, the supergiant cD-type elliptical that lies near the center of the larger Coma potential well. In Baum et al (1997) and in our Paper III (Woodworth & Harris 2000), similar material was presented for IC 4051, another giant on the outskirts of the Coma cluster core region. In the present paper, we discuss new results (GCS radial distribution, total population, metallicity distribution, and luminosity function) for two additional Coma members, NGC 4889 and 4926, that have not previously been published.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In Papers I and II of our series on the Coma cluster (Kavelaars et al 2000;Harris et al 2000), we discussed the GCS in NGC 4874, the supergiant cD-type elliptical that lies near the center of the larger Coma potential well. In Baum et al (1997) and in our Paper III (Woodworth & Harris 2000), similar material was presented for IC 4051, another giant on the outskirts of the Coma cluster core region. In the present paper, we discuss new results (GCS radial distribution, total population, metallicity distribution, and luminosity function) for two additional Coma members, NGC 4889 and 4926, that have not previously been published.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This was implicit in the work of McLaughlin (1994), who advocated using piecewise power laws to fit the number of GCs per unit linear luminosity-or piecewise exponentials to describe the usual number of GCs per unit magnitude. Baum et al (1997) used an asymmetric hyperbolic function to fit the strong peak and asymmetry in the combined Galactic and M31 GCLF.…”
Section: The Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample chosen for this present, higher‐resolution spectroscopic study was selected to include only spectroscopically confirmed members of the Coma cluster and to have 14.5 < R Kron < 19.4 and 19.5 < 〈μ R 〉 < 24.3 mag arcsec −2 , where R Kron and 〈μ〉 are the Kron magnitudes and average surface brightness over the Kron radius (an intensity weighted radius; Mob01), respectively. These limits correspond to −20.6 < M R < −15.7, and thus our sample includes galaxies on either side of the boundary between dwarfs and giants, which we define following Mob01 to be at M R =−17.5 or R = 17.6 at the distance of Coma, assuming a distance modulus of 35.1 for the cluster (Baum et al 1997). For simplicity, we will primarily refer to these objects as dwarfs, given that the sample as a whole covers a distinct region of parameter space in luminosity and velocity dispersion compared to previous studies.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%