2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-007-0032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance sampling as an effective method for monitoring feral pigeon (Columba livia f. domestica) urban populations

Abstract: a viable and efficient alternative to the traditional methods used to estimate feral pigeons 31 population size and to monitor trends.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, while the development of pest control techniques for feral pigeons have involved a significant amount of research (see below), in comparison, research aimed to develop unbiased methods for estimating pigeon population size has aroused far less interest. Pigeons counts are intrinsically difficult both because of the characteristics of urban environments (complex structure and poor visibility) and of the pigeons themselves (clustered distribution and high density; Buijs & Van Wijnen, 2001;Giunchi et al, 2007b;Johnston & Janiga, 1995;Jokimäki & Suhonen, 1998). Probably for these difficulties, several authors adopted ad hoc and uncalibrated indexes of population abundance, such as: (1) counts of naturally occurring 224 flocks (e.g., Buijs & Van Wijnen, 2001;Haag-Wackernagel, 1995); (2) counts of birds attracted with food (Dobeic et al, 2011;Sacchi et al, 2002); (3) counts carried out by walking along a random sample of square, non-overlapping sampling units ('quadrat counts'; Senar, 1996;Sol & Senar, 1992).…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, while the development of pest control techniques for feral pigeons have involved a significant amount of research (see below), in comparison, research aimed to develop unbiased methods for estimating pigeon population size has aroused far less interest. Pigeons counts are intrinsically difficult both because of the characteristics of urban environments (complex structure and poor visibility) and of the pigeons themselves (clustered distribution and high density; Buijs & Van Wijnen, 2001;Giunchi et al, 2007b;Johnston & Janiga, 1995;Jokimäki & Suhonen, 1998). Probably for these difficulties, several authors adopted ad hoc and uncalibrated indexes of population abundance, such as: (1) counts of naturally occurring 224 flocks (e.g., Buijs & Van Wijnen, 2001;Haag-Wackernagel, 1995); (2) counts of birds attracted with food (Dobeic et al, 2011;Sacchi et al, 2002); (3) counts carried out by walking along a random sample of square, non-overlapping sampling units ('quadrat counts'; Senar, 1996;Sol & Senar, 1992).…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While still widely used in wildlife management due to their relatively low costs, population indexes are however highly criticized because their critical assumption (proportionality between index and true population density) is usually violated in real situation (see Sutherland, 1996;Williams et al, 2002 and references therein). In the case of feral pigeons, this often led to the impossibility of an objective evaluation and quantification of the actual effects of most pest control programmes (see Giunchi et al, 2007b for further details). More reliable population estimates have been obtained by combining the quadrat counts with the use of 'correction factors', which take into account the imperfect bird detectability and are estimated by using a mark-resight procedure on a subsample of the study area (Sacchi et al, 2002;Senar, 1996).…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations