2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance makes the difference in thermography for ecological studies

Abstract: Surface temperature drives many ecological processes and infrared thermography is widely used by ecologists to measure the thermal heterogeneity of different species' habitats. However, the potential bias in temperature readings caused by distance between the surface to be measured and the camera is still poorly acknowledged. We examined the effect of distance from 0.3 to 80m on a variety of thermal metrics (mean temperature, standard deviation, patch richness and aggregation) under various weather conditions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface temperature might be underestimated at large shooting distances. We chose a 30 degree angle from photographer to the ground in order to minimize distortion in measurement accuracy of photographs from the front to back of the image (Faye et al 2016). The FLIR E40 thermal imaging camera, which captures 76,000 samples per photograph, can accurately measure the temperature of a 1 cm 2 spot from more than 120 cm away.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface temperature might be underestimated at large shooting distances. We chose a 30 degree angle from photographer to the ground in order to minimize distortion in measurement accuracy of photographs from the front to back of the image (Faye et al 2016). The FLIR E40 thermal imaging camera, which captures 76,000 samples per photograph, can accurately measure the temperature of a 1 cm 2 spot from more than 120 cm away.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if several objects are of similar distances from the camera, the information on relative temperature differences should be accurate compared to their absolute temperatures (Faye et al. , see Kim et al. for further detail).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for emissivity values between 0.94 and 0.96, which is reasonable for most vegetation, the error is~1°C (Aubrecht et al 2016). Furthermore, if several objects are of similar distances from the camera, the information on relative temperature differences should be accurate compared to their absolute temperatures (Faye et al 2016, see Kim et al 2016 for further detail). Distances of canopy surface types selected for analyses (deciduous canopy, evergreen canopy, flowers, and bark), measured with a laser range finder, were 57 m, 51 m, 143 m, and 57 m, respectively.…”
Section: Study Site and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An infrared camera (FLIR Systems, B335, Wilsonville, OR, USA), equipped with a macro lens (FLIR Systems, IR Lens 10 mm), was used to acquire instantaneously the thermal images of several leaves either exposed to solar radiation or shaded in the canopy. The camera had a spatial resolution of 0.49 mm (at a distance of 20 cm) and a thermal resolution of 0.05 °C (Faye et al ). Four sessions of image acquisition were done in 2012, on 23 July around noon, 8 August around noon and 16:00 and 17 August around 09:30.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%