2009
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance Education in China and India: Collectivism and Connectivism

Abstract: In the last decade, China and India have seen large increases in their literacy and graduation rates and an increasing emphasis on distance education and training initiatives. They are examples of nations in which economic and technological initiatives have been aligned in order to produce outcomes that ensure the population will thrive in the 21 st century. However, no country can simply equip its distance education system with updated technologies and expect to be fully prepared for 21 st century economic ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the competing organizations of the first movers can trigger failure by not investing (Tabb, 2016). Further, in view of its potential effects on different stakeholders, organizations seeking competitive advantage are affected not only by the adoption of technological innovations but also by socio-politico-economic factors (Carter, 2009), and these issues need to be given proper attention before applying automating technologies such as blockchain. The complex processes comprising subjective reviews of behaviors and outcomes need human intervention, which cannot be tackled by blockchain and smart contracts; and hence, organizations should use it in conjunction with commensurate technological and employability skills to meet strategic objectives, goals and stakeholders' demands (Faridi and Ouseph, 2014).…”
Section: Potentialities Of Blockchain As Strategic Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the competing organizations of the first movers can trigger failure by not investing (Tabb, 2016). Further, in view of its potential effects on different stakeholders, organizations seeking competitive advantage are affected not only by the adoption of technological innovations but also by socio-politico-economic factors (Carter, 2009), and these issues need to be given proper attention before applying automating technologies such as blockchain. The complex processes comprising subjective reviews of behaviors and outcomes need human intervention, which cannot be tackled by blockchain and smart contracts; and hence, organizations should use it in conjunction with commensurate technological and employability skills to meet strategic objectives, goals and stakeholders' demands (Faridi and Ouseph, 2014).…”
Section: Potentialities Of Blockchain As Strategic Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, issues such as requirement of “Proof of Work” consensus cause enormous energy wastage in addition to very slow rate of transactions per second affecting performance (Vukolić, 2016) and thus prove to be costly to ODL, which has already been overloaded with massive fixed assets investments. Here, it is notable that not only the technological advancement adoption but also the politico-economic factors affect immensely ODL (Carter, 2009), which make the learning process/behaviors/outcomes in ODL complex requiring their subjective reviews necessarily requiring human intervention practically uncontrollable by the automated blockchain. Nonetheless, ODL ought to demonstrate greater foresight to consider the strategic potentialities of blockchain as an intangible idiosyncratic resource with VRIN attributes.…”
Section: Strategic Potentialities Of Blockchain For Odlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fulfill the needs and expectations of its different stakeholders, ODL plays a supplementary role to the conventional system, with the help of its flexible and liberal approach without compromising the quality. The transformation in ODL in order to gain competitiveness is driven not only by the technological advancement and its adoption but by the politico-economical factors also, in view of its potential effects on different stakeholders (Carter, 2009). The general tendency of stakeholders, to show resistance, changes along with the change in their perception that their problems are being solved.…”
Section: Competitiveness In Odl: Stakeholders' Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%