2006
DOI: 10.1007/11853886_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance-Based Repairs of Databases

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce a general framework for repairing inconsistent databases by distance-based considerations. The uniform way of representing repairs and their semantics clarifies the essence behind various approaches to consistency restoration in database systems, helps to compare the underlying formalisms, and relates them to existing methods of defining belief revision operators, merging data sets, and integrating information systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 That is, d f is obtained by applying f on the distances among matched elements and on the distances among non-matched elements and the other set. c) A matching m between sets A and B is called…”
Section: Distance Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 That is, d f is obtained by applying f on the distances among matched elements and on the distances among non-matched elements and the other set. c) A matching m between sets A and B is called…”
Section: Distance Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the function value is non-decreasing when an element in the multiset is replaced by a larger element 3. Alternatively, one could define, for a nonempty set S, d(e, S) = 1 2 max{d(e, s) | s ∈ S}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, reasoning with distance semantics is a cornerstone behind many formalisms for maintaining uncertainty, such as operators for modelling belief revision (e.g., [7,16,18,24,29]), methodologies for merging independent datasources [20,21,25], consistent query answering in database systems [1,3,4,9,10,26], and several areas in the context of social choice theory, such as group decision making [22], preference representation [23], and judgment aggregation [17,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%