Distance based Reliable and Energy Efficient (DREE) Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Tariq, Moeenuddin; Latiff, Muhammad Shafie Abd; Ayaz, Muhammad; Coulibaly, Yahaya; Al-Areqi, Nadera Najib

doi:10.4304/jnw.10.5.311-321

Cited by 27 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Physical distance is taken into account in Distance Based Reliable And Energy Efficient (DREE) protocol but has not been utilized. DREE utilizes Fuzzy logic-based link Quality Estimator (F-LQE) [19]. Cooperative energy efficient protocol is a nature of wireless medium and DPSN are transmitted in this by means of nearby sensor nodes as relay node [20].…”

Section: Main Reference Schemes In Previous Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Analysis on Localization Free Routing Protocols in UWSNs

Teekaraman¹,

Sthapit²,

Choe³

et al. 2019

IJCIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TThe challenges faced in underwater communication systems are limited bandwidth, Energy consumption rate, larger propagation delay time, End-End Delay (E-ED), 3D topology, media access control, routing, resource utilization and power constraints. These issues and challenges are solved by means of deploying the energy efficient protocol. The protocol can either be localization-based protocol or localization free protocol. In this paper, review of localization free protocols were discussed and reviewed with reference to environmental factors, data transmission rate, transmission efficiency, energy consumption rate, E-ED and propagation delay. The review analysis gives the pros and cons to give rise to the new directions of research for future improvements in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs). This manuscript propose a survey on localization free protocol according to the problem addressed or the major parameter considered during routing in UWSNs. Unlike the existing survey, the present survey focuses on present state and art of routing protocols, in terms of routing strategy issues addressed. The solutions of energy efficient protocol is arrived by highlighting the pros of each protocols. The description of routing strategy for each protocol is presented to understand its operation in an understandable form. The cons of each protocol is taken into consideration for further investigation and to arrive the best protocol. The presented routing strategy, pros and cons provide open challenges and research directions for future investigation.

show abstract

Section: Main Reference Schemes In Previous Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Analysis on Localization Free Routing Protocols in UWSNs

Teekaraman¹,

Sthapit²,

Choe³

et al. 2019

IJCIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, they use path delay, path loss and remaining energy for relay selection. However, the protocols assume that the channel link is symmetric, which is not practical in underwater since acoustic channels in underwater are known to be asymmetric [10] [20].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grid Based Priority Routing Protocol for UWSNs

Al-Salti

Alzeidi²,

Day³

et al. 2017

IJCNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• pressure-based protocols • beacon-based protocols Pressure-based routing protocols for underwater networks such as ERP, 22 FDBR, 23 and DBR 24 are equipped with a pressure sensor that allows them to calculate their depth based on the water pressure on each sensor to facilitate them in data forwarding. 16 Many of these protocol such as VAPR, 25 PSBR, 26 and EEDBR 27 along with the accessory of pressure sensors do use beacon messages for information distribution among the nodes during the information distribution phase. However, their data forwarding and information distribution involve calculation of depth parameter.…”

Section: Routing Protocols For Underwater Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beacon‐based routing protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks

Tariq

Latiff

Ayaz

et al. 2017

Int J Communication

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UW-ASN) are provisioned with limited bandwidth, long variable propagation delay, limited available energy, highly unreliable acoustic channels, and random node mobility. Consequently, efficient data routing between source destination pair requires UW-ASN to apply a technology different than terrestrial networks. For the past few years researchers have proposed many robust and efficient routing protocols for UW-ASN, thus reviewing the challenges posed by stringent underwater environment. These protocols can be broadly categorized into localization based and localization-free protocols. This paper presents a critical review of beacon-based localization-free routing protocols and suggest possible solution to improve the working of studied beacon based protocols. This work categorizes beacon based protocols into hop-by-hop, end-to-end, single, and multiple parameters based forwarding protocols. This categorization will help to differentiate and identify the requirements for the development of new beacon-based protocols. Finally, this paper presents performance comparison based on simulation results and outlines the research gap and future directions. KEYWORDS energy consumption, link quality, sensor networks, underwater routing protocols Int J Commun Syst. 2017;30:e3375.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/dac

show abstract

Distance based Reliable and Energy Efficient (DREE) Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Cited by 27 publications

References 22 publications

Energy Analysis on Localization Free Routing Protocols in UWSNs

Energy Analysis on Localization Free Routing Protocols in UWSNs

Grid Based Priority Routing Protocol for UWSNs

Beacon‐based routing protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About