“…However, it is a widespread misconception that digital technologies provide flexibility in themselves. Flexibility is primarily connected to pedagogies (Nikolov, Lai, Sendova, & Jonker, 2018). In particular, blended education seems to fit well with student-centred learning approaches (cf.…”
Section: Blended Curriculummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With regard to the teacher, challenges arise in relation to course development and lesson enactment. Two challenges can be recognised: there is a lack of a clear focus on pedagogies and learning theories that are suitable for a flexible educational context, and teachers who do not hold a student-centered view need to be supported to align their pedagogical beliefs and practices with an approach that supports learners in their learning process (Nikolov et al, 2018). Teachers coming from a f2f context need to rethink their assumptions about teaching and learning when online teaching is required (Baran et al, 2011;Gerbic, 2011).…”
This study offers insights into the processes that play a role in realising curriculum flexibility. Curriculum flexibility is conceptualised in terms of adaptability and accessibility of the curriculum to students’ needs and capabilities. To realise curriculum flexibility, the teacher education institution in this study designed a blended curriculum with face-to-face and online components. This flexible curriculum aimed at increasing student enrolment and allowing for variety in students’ graduation portfolios. Through semi-structured interviews with 10 teacher educators, conditions that could foster or hinder the realisation of flexibility were investigated. Results indicate that different contextual, teacher-, and student-related conditions were perceived to affect (further) curriculum flexibility. Furthermore, teacher educators identified several challenges related to these influential conditions, which were recognised as tensions. Based on a discussion of these findings, recommendations for research and practice are given.
“…However, it is a widespread misconception that digital technologies provide flexibility in themselves. Flexibility is primarily connected to pedagogies (Nikolov, Lai, Sendova, & Jonker, 2018). In particular, blended education seems to fit well with student-centred learning approaches (cf.…”
Section: Blended Curriculummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With regard to the teacher, challenges arise in relation to course development and lesson enactment. Two challenges can be recognised: there is a lack of a clear focus on pedagogies and learning theories that are suitable for a flexible educational context, and teachers who do not hold a student-centered view need to be supported to align their pedagogical beliefs and practices with an approach that supports learners in their learning process (Nikolov et al, 2018). Teachers coming from a f2f context need to rethink their assumptions about teaching and learning when online teaching is required (Baran et al, 2011;Gerbic, 2011).…”
This study offers insights into the processes that play a role in realising curriculum flexibility. Curriculum flexibility is conceptualised in terms of adaptability and accessibility of the curriculum to students’ needs and capabilities. To realise curriculum flexibility, the teacher education institution in this study designed a blended curriculum with face-to-face and online components. This flexible curriculum aimed at increasing student enrolment and allowing for variety in students’ graduation portfolios. Through semi-structured interviews with 10 teacher educators, conditions that could foster or hinder the realisation of flexibility were investigated. Results indicate that different contextual, teacher-, and student-related conditions were perceived to affect (further) curriculum flexibility. Furthermore, teacher educators identified several challenges related to these influential conditions, which were recognised as tensions. Based on a discussion of these findings, recommendations for research and practice are given.
“…In the educational system, digitality is no longer a new cultural skill, and digital media are only "new" technologies to a limited extent; their significance and that of their possible and necessary applications, however, has shifted significantly amid preventive measures in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Even in the medium and long term, in the post-pandemic phase, models of distance learning and homeschooling will continue to be part of everyday school life (Nikolov et al 2018). Accordingly, physical classrooms, artifacts, and configurations are primarily aimed neither at infection control nor at open -teaching concepts or alternative teaching-learning arrangements (Röhl 2016), which have thus far had to be adapted and improvised in teaching scenarios.…”
Section: Digital Cultures and New Models Of Teaching And Learningmentioning
To slow down the proliferation of Covid-19, governments virtually shut down public life, temporarily closed schools, and forced teaching to be done exclusively on a remote basis. These measures offer an opportunity to reexamine conventional teaching and learning arrangements, test new digital and analogue concepts, and provide essential inspiration for curriculum making in the twenty-first century. This article addresses the historical development of schooling in the classroom as differentiated from “homeschooling”. On one hand, the question of how school closures and digitally supported teaching settings may affect an increase in educational inequalities is investigated using an international comparison. On the other hand, the pedagogical and didactical implications of distance learning and a digital teaching culture, which constitute the foundation for digital curriculum making, are examined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.