2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal radius fracture: A prospective outcome study of 275 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
2
54
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…28 In general we believe that the outcomes reported (according to the instruments that we used) are consistent with other published reports. 11,28 There are several possible explanations for our findings. First, the lack of association between the radiographic and functional outcomes among the elderly could be related to decreased demand on the upper extremity that is thought to be associated with aging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 In general we believe that the outcomes reported (according to the instruments that we used) are consistent with other published reports. 11,28 There are several possible explanations for our findings. First, the lack of association between the radiographic and functional outcomes among the elderly could be related to decreased demand on the upper extremity that is thought to be associated with aging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Distal radius fractures were defined as those occurring within 2 cm of the distal end of the radius. 11 Patients who refused or were unable to provide informed consent, were unable to communicate in English, had bilateral distal radius fractures, had had surgical treatment, or were residing in long-term care facilities were excluded from the study. All included patients maintained an activity level that allowed independent living both before and after the fracture.…”
Section: Subjects and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the quantitative evidence identified, it was found that therapy management of those with wrist fractures is diverse. 10 A systematic review of 15 randomized controlled trials to investigate the effectiveness of a range of rehabilitation interventions provided by physiotherapists or occupational therapists found that no single treatment approach had the best effect in terms of objective measurements, functional assessments or patient self-report outcome measures, in follow-up periods ranging from four weeks to nine months. Research evidence was not strong because of the limited methodological quality of the studies reviewed, as well as the range of interventions offered and confounders such as motivation of trial participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have the shortest follow-up, which is a criticism of our study, but it can be expected that our results will continue to improve for up to 12 months, as predicted by Yen et al [21] and Madcdermid et al [16]. The function in our study is excellent despite inferior radiological results compared to those reported for nonbridging external fixation and ORIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%