2022
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal radioulnar joint kinematics before surgery and 12 months following open foveal reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: comparison with the contralateral non-injured joint

Abstract: Background and purpose: Foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesion may cause distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Dynamic radiostereometry (dRSA) has been validated for objective measurement of DRUJ kinematics. We evaluated DRUJ kinematics by dRSA before surgery and 12 months following open foveal reinsertion of the TFCC in comparison with contralateral non-injured DRUJs.Patients and methods: In a prospective cohort study, 21 patients (11 men) of mean age 34 years (22–50) with arthroscopical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was first developed for the dynamic analysis of artificial joints 22 and has been used for knee 23 and shoulder 24 joint dynamic analyses in vivo. While dynamic analysis of the forearm has been performed using single-plane serial fluoroscopic images 25 27 , only a few reports exist using biplane imaging, despite their superior accuracy in registration matching 28 , 29 . Therefore, we developed a unique intensity-based biplane 2D–3D registration matching method that uses density gradient information 30 , 31 between fluoroscopic and CT images to perform dynamic analysis 32 at 12.5 fps, resulting in a truly dynamic analysis method compared with the techniques used in previous reports 18 21 , 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was first developed for the dynamic analysis of artificial joints 22 and has been used for knee 23 and shoulder 24 joint dynamic analyses in vivo. While dynamic analysis of the forearm has been performed using single-plane serial fluoroscopic images 25 27 , only a few reports exist using biplane imaging, despite their superior accuracy in registration matching 28 , 29 . Therefore, we developed a unique intensity-based biplane 2D–3D registration matching method that uses density gradient information 30 , 31 between fluoroscopic and CT images to perform dynamic analysis 32 at 12.5 fps, resulting in a truly dynamic analysis method compared with the techniques used in previous reports 18 21 , 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%