2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal embolization during primary angioplasty: Histopathologic features and predictability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…diabetic patients undergoing primary PCI. These findings strengthen the argument for the crucial role of platelet reactivity and the thrombus burden in the pathogenesis of no-reflow [12]. …”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…diabetic patients undergoing primary PCI. These findings strengthen the argument for the crucial role of platelet reactivity and the thrombus burden in the pathogenesis of no-reflow [12]. …”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the same setting, other researchers have also shown that abciximab does not affect the total number and the mean total volume of embolized material or its qualitative composition. 30 This perhaps suggests that a similar mechanism of distal embolization, possibly consisting of plaque debris rather than thrombotic material, may occur in both elective and primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Clinical Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Recent observations indicate that periprocedural MIs are associated with increased atherosclerotic burden and large LCPs. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Embolization of the lipid core of stenotic plaques after PCI has been implicated as an important cause of periprocedural no-reflow and MI in both the presence and absence of intracoronary thrombus. [23][24][25][26] The efficacy of embolic protection devices (EPDs) in preventing embolic complications after PCI of saphenous vein grafts and carotid arteries suggests that embolic periprocedural MIs occurring during dilations of stenoses in native coronary arteries may be prevented if LCPs prone to periprocedural MI could be accurately identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%