2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissolved organic fluorophores in southeastern US coastal waters: correction method for eliminating Rayleigh and Raman scattering peaks in excitation–emission matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
184
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
184
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emission (Em) spectra were collected from 250 to 600 nm at 2 nm intervals at excitation (Ex) wavelengths from 250 to 500 nm at 5 nm intervals. Backgrounds were subtracted for fresh distilled water prepared daily from the sample data to eliminate Raman scatter peaks (Zepp et al, 2004). All data were obtained in counts per second (cps) and converted to a ppb quinine sulfate standard solution in 0.1 N sulfuric acid at Ex / Em of 350 / 450 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emission (Em) spectra were collected from 250 to 600 nm at 2 nm intervals at excitation (Ex) wavelengths from 250 to 500 nm at 5 nm intervals. Backgrounds were subtracted for fresh distilled water prepared daily from the sample data to eliminate Raman scatter peaks (Zepp et al, 2004). All data were obtained in counts per second (cps) and converted to a ppb quinine sulfate standard solution in 0.1 N sulfuric acid at Ex / Em of 350 / 450 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scans were standardized to Raman units (normalized to the integral of the Raman signal between 390 and 410 nm in emission at a fixed excitation of 350 nm) with a Milli-Q water sample run the same day as the samples (Zepp et al 2004). PARAFAC model was build using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and the drEEM Toolbox version 1.0 (Murphy et al 2013).…”
Section: Parafac Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter can be considered as outlying elements or outliers of the second type, because this scatter does not contain any chemically relevant information and does not follow the tri-linear model. Several ways to handle scatter in relation to PARAFAC modeling can be found in the literature [7,11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] but treating scatter as outlying elements leads in Engelen et al [2] to the construction of the automated scatter identification method. The approach can handle both first and second order Rayleigh scatter as well as Raman scatter and require no a priori information about the scatter itself, like for example the placement or the width of the scatter ridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%