2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissolved and particulate zinc and nickel in the Yangtze River (China): Distribution, sources and fluxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a positive correlation between NiD and MnD, r ¼ 0.88, Fig. 5j), like previously observed in the Port Curtis Estuary, Australia (Angel et al, 2010) and in Yangtze River Estuary (Wen et al, 2013). Dur-D ing both seasons, the stability of Log K Ni suggests that Ni was poorly reactive in the estuary.…”
Section: Nickelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…a positive correlation between NiD and MnD, r ¼ 0.88, Fig. 5j), like previously observed in the Port Curtis Estuary, Australia (Angel et al, 2010) and in Yangtze River Estuary (Wen et al, 2013). Dur-D ing both seasons, the stability of Log K Ni suggests that Ni was poorly reactive in the estuary.…”
Section: Nickelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…POC (10,135 t y À1 ) and PON (977 t y À1 ) fluxes present the same seasonal trend, with the highest percentage transported in the rainy season. The seasonal variation, observed in the transport of these chemical species associated with the FSS of the Sorocaba River, was influenced more by the temporal variability of discharge and FSS concentrations, than by their concentration variations in the dry and rainy seasons, as already reported in the literature for other basins (Kucuksezgin et al, 2008;Radakovich et al, 2008;Song et al, 2010;Wen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fss Trace Elements and Pom Fluxes In The River And Seasonalsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, according to Zhang and Liu (2002), in many studies it was agreed that 0.5 < EF < 1.5 are indicatives of natural contribution and for EF > 1.5 a significant percentage of the element comes from other sources, such as the biota and anthropogenic pollution. Fixed values for EF have been also used to differentiate natural contributions from anthropogenic sources, such as 1.0 (Miller et al, 2007;Viers et al, 2009), 1.5 (Harikumar and Jisha, 2010) and 2.0 Probst, 2006a, 2006b;Mukherjee, 2014;Roussiez et al, 2013;Wen et al, 2013;Woitke et al, 2003). In our study it was assumed that for EF 1 the contributions of the trace element studied are natural (soil and rocks erosion processes) and for EF > 1 the contributions of the trace elements can be related to natural and anthropogenic sources (domestic and industrial effluents).…”
Section: Sources Of Trace Elements and Environmental Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δD and δ 18 Oare frequently used to identify water sources and inputs during snowmelt and rainfall events (Jin et al, 2012;Klaus and McDonnell, 2013;Liu et al, 2004;Mast et al, 1995). Similarly, specific trace elements mayshow unique systematic processes during flood events and across seasons (Elbaz-Poulichet et al, 2006;Ollivier et al, 2006;Roussiez et al, 2013;Wen et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dissolved Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn concentrations were significantly higher in the Lena River (Russia) during the spring freshet relative to the rest of the year (Holemann et al, 2005).Furthermore, trace element concentrations coupled with δD and δ 18 Oreflect impacts from the built environment, including water sources and chemistry influenced by dams and diversions (Wen et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%