1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociative Tendencies, Attention, and Memory

Abstract: Abstract-Two groups of college students were selected on the basis of their scores on the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). The high-DES group (score > 20, M = 29.6; n = 54) and low-DES group (score < 10, M = 5.1; n = 54) Dissociation has been defined as the lack of integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into the stream of consciousness. Most people report some dissociative experiences, such as "highway hypnosis" (when one apparently loses conscious awareness of driving for some period of ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
120
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
12
120
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with past research using a surprise recall task after instructing participants to ignore the words, participants remembered only a small percentage of the words (e.g., 4 %-10 %; Baddeley, Lewis, Eldridge, & Thomson, 1984;DePrince & Freyd, 1999). Analyses did not show a relationship between cognitive narrowing and condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Consistent with past research using a surprise recall task after instructing participants to ignore the words, participants remembered only a small percentage of the words (e.g., 4 %-10 %; Baddeley, Lewis, Eldridge, & Thomson, 1984;DePrince & Freyd, 1999). Analyses did not show a relationship between cognitive narrowing and condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, a number of findings go against the latter interpretation. HDHS participants exhibited superior baseline cognitive control, whereas high dissociative individuals commonly exhibit attentional deficits in control conditions (DePrince & Freyd, 1999;Giesbrecht & Merckelbach, 2009;Giesbrecht, Merckelbach, Geraerts, & Smeets, 2004). This is commensurate with the observed positive, albeit non-significant, correlation demonstrating poorer baseline conflict adaptation among high dissociative LS participants and our own recent finding that high and low dissociative individuals do not exhibit di↵erent sequential congruency e↵ects (Terhune, Cardeña, & Lindgren, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, when dividing their attention, high dissociators remember fewer abuse-related words than low dissociators (DePrince & Freyd, 1999, 2001. Thus, when allowed to divide attention, high levels of dissociation seem to help people keep abuse-related information out of awareness (DePrince & Freyd, 1999, 2001Becker-Blease & DePrince, in press). While these studies did not examine memory and revictimization, failure to recall trauma-related information may increase revictimization risk to the extent that high dissociators fail to track threatening information.…”
Section: Dissociation and Revictimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research suggests that dissociation and basic attention performance are related. Participants (aged 18-21) who scored high on a dissociation measure performed better on a reaction time task when dividing their attention compared to focusing their attention; participants who scored low on dissociation performed better when focusing their attention (DePrince & Freyd, 1999). In turn, when dividing their attention, high dissociators remember fewer abuse-related words than low dissociators (DePrince & Freyd, 1999, 2001.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation