1972
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/5/11/019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociative recombination at elevated temperatures. II. Comparison between theory and experiment in neon and argon afterglows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure-driven shock tube used in this work was structurally similar to that described previously by Cunningham and Hobson ( 1972). Tu undertake measurements of recombination rate coefficients at elevated temperatures between 500 and 3000 K, non-ionising shock waves (Mach 1.6 to Mach 6) were propagated into downstream pressures of the helium-neon mixtures between 2 and 6Torr.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The pressure-driven shock tube used in this work was structurally similar to that described previously by Cunningham and Hobson ( 1972). Tu undertake measurements of recombination rate coefficients at elevated temperatures between 500 and 3000 K, non-ionising shock waves (Mach 1.6 to Mach 6) were propagated into downstream pressures of the helium-neon mixtures between 2 and 6Torr.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tu undertake measurements of recombination rate coefficients at elevated temperatures between 500 and 3000 K, non-ionising shock waves (Mach 1.6 to Mach 6) were propagated into downstream pressures of the helium-neon mixtures between 2 and 6Torr. Depending upon the helium partial pressure and hence speed of sound in the mixture, different combinations of diaphragm thicknesses (0.1 to 0.3 mm) and driver gas (helium, argon or nitrogen) were used to vary the Mach number (Cunningham and Hobson 1972). The thin diaphragm was ruptured by over-pressurisation and the attendant shock wave travelled along a 7 m long Pyrex flow channel of 4 cm internal diameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations