Discussions of anger and forgiveness rarely address the difficulties of the victim. In this article, the relationship of trauma to resulting anger is discussed, guidelines are presented for possible victim forgiving, and anger-forgiveness is placed in the context of the ego state model.Much of the writing and theory on anger has been concerned with the frustrations and conflicts associated with ordinary situations. Accordingly, cognitive therapists (e.g., Beck, 1976;Ellis, 1976;Novaco, 1986) encourage patients to monitor and modify behaviors and underlying cognitions so that they do not make themselves unnecessarily angry. Similarly, perhaps as a parallel to the increased emphasis on "healing" in psychological and self-help circles, forgiveness is encouraged as a necessary aspect to growth (e.g., Coleman, 1989; Fitzgibbons, 1986;Hope, 1987;Whitfield, 1987). On the other hand, such writers as Perls (1969), Maltz andHolman (1987), and even Freud (1963) insist that the acknowledgement and expression of anger is crucial. Part of the discrepancy in approaches to anger no doubt has to do with the differing goals of various therapeutic orientations, part probably is a reflection of how "anger" is differentially defined, and part has to do with the populations for whom treatment is being proposed. As Hare-Mustin (1986, p. 23) said, "For every problem there is a solution that is simple, elegant, and wrong." Treating all patients who have difficulties with anger with the same