2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociative attachment to excited SF6: selective IR excitation versus thermal activation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they found a substantial isotope effect with the photon-induced yield for 34 SF À 5 production being optimal on the 10P44 line near 920 cm À1 . Recent similar work by Rosa et al [17] confirmed the results of Chen and Chantry. Rosa et al proposed that in the framework of localized potential energy surfaces the effect of the laser-excited m 3 mode on SF À 5 production at E % 0 eV is explained by the level of the curve crossing between the neutral and anionic system matching the energy of the m 3 vibration.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they found a substantial isotope effect with the photon-induced yield for 34 SF À 5 production being optimal on the 10P44 line near 920 cm À1 . Recent similar work by Rosa et al [17] confirmed the results of Chen and Chantry. Rosa et al proposed that in the framework of localized potential energy surfaces the effect of the laser-excited m 3 mode on SF À 5 production at E % 0 eV is explained by the level of the curve crossing between the neutral and anionic system matching the energy of the m 3 vibration.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The shape of the DEA cross section was found to be strongly dependent on the gas temperature T G (i.e. on the internal rovibrational energy of the SF 6 target molecules), exhibiting a shift and a rise of the peak cross section towards zero energy with increasing T G [3,8,15,[17][18][19]. To account for these observations, the higher energy peak in SF À 5 production has been attributed to attachment into a repulsive potential surface and subsequent direct dissociation [8,11,12,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations