1971
DOI: 10.1210/jcem-32-5-595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation of the Disappearance of Bioactive and Radioimmunoreactive ACTH from Plasma in Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
8

Year Published

1973
1973
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
43
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The disappearance of ACTH from the circulation is rapid, with a circulating half-life dependent on assay methodology. By bioassay, this is 8-14 min, 5 but immunoassays suggest both shorter 6 or longer 7 clearance times.…”
Section: Bioactivity and Half-lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disappearance of ACTH from the circulation is rapid, with a circulating half-life dependent on assay methodology. By bioassay, this is 8-14 min, 5 but immunoassays suggest both shorter 6 or longer 7 clearance times.…”
Section: Bioactivity and Half-lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACTH appears to be degraded both in circulating blood and in tissues by the action of proteolytic enzymes that cleave the molecule first in its N-terminal sequence, thus destroying its steroidogenic activity, and subsequently in its C-terminal portions (White & Gross, 1957;Imura et a/., 1967;Besser et al, 1971a). Therefore it might be expected that ACTH biological activity would disappear faster from blood than immunological reactivity, that bioactive ACTH levels in plasma would be lower than immunoreactive levels and that, in turn, N-terminally reactive ACTH levels would be lower than C-terminally reactive ACTH.…”
Section: Relationship Of Immunoassay Results To Bioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This had led to some confusion since it has not always been fully explained in the published papers. An example of this is given in the assessment of the potency of the highly purified human ACTH of Lerner, Upton & Lande (preparation 8B), which was reported by Besser et al (1971a) as 101 5 19.0 (S.D.) units per mg, using the intravenous Lipscomb-Nelson assay.…”
Section: S T a N D A R D S F O R A C T H Assay Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more dynamic situations, in which the hormone levels rise rapidly and fall quickly, as in the insulin hypoglycaemia test in vivo, differences between radioimmunoassay and the cytochemical bioassay became apparent during the period when the levels were falling (Fleisher, Glass, Bitensky, Chayen & Daly, 1974). This would reflect the longer half-life of the hormone, as measured by the radioimmunoassay which was still detecting biologically inactive fragments (Besser et al, 1971).…”
Section: Validity Of the Cytochemical Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there was no point in raising an antibody to the a-subunit of FSH since that antibody would cross-react with all glyco¬ protein hormones which have the common subunit. Equally, it was inadvisable to use an antibody to the C-terminal amino acids of ACTH when the biological activity resided in the N-terminal part; the former could give erroneous values for biological activity (as discussed by Besser et al, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%