1972
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80097-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation of mammalian D‐glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase into monomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For WASP, the concentration in the assays was saturating, and for actin filaments it was as high as possible without affecting the viscosity or solubility during the assays. The concentration of actin filaments was two‐fold higher than the maximum reported K d values for aldolase‐actin interactions (0.4–5.0 μM; [Lakatos, Závodszky, & Elódi, 1972; Walsh, Winzor, Clarke, Masters, & Morton, 1980]). Of course, these in vitro concentrations are much diluted from the reported in vivo concentrations of actin (>100 μM [Millard, Sharp, & Machesky, 2004]) and aldolase (6–37 μM [Lundmark & Carlsson, 2003; Orosz et al, 1988; Ottaway & Mowbray, 1977]), but activity assays were performed to assure that binding occurred while the enzyme catalysis was being monitored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For WASP, the concentration in the assays was saturating, and for actin filaments it was as high as possible without affecting the viscosity or solubility during the assays. The concentration of actin filaments was two‐fold higher than the maximum reported K d values for aldolase‐actin interactions (0.4–5.0 μM; [Lakatos, Závodszky, & Elódi, 1972; Walsh, Winzor, Clarke, Masters, & Morton, 1980]). Of course, these in vitro concentrations are much diluted from the reported in vivo concentrations of actin (>100 μM [Millard, Sharp, & Machesky, 2004]) and aldolase (6–37 μM [Lundmark & Carlsson, 2003; Orosz et al, 1988; Ottaway & Mowbray, 1977]), but activity assays were performed to assure that binding occurred while the enzyme catalysis was being monitored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, research has been concentrated on evaiuating the activity of oligomeric structures (26)(27)(28). However, research has been concentrated on evaiuating the activity of oligomeric structures (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research has been concentrated on evaiuating the activity of oligomeric structures (26)(27)(28). A relatively weak perturbation of variables leads to a shift in the T w D t t M equilibria, indicating low stability (small AGdis) of the oligomeric structures [dilution of the enzyme solutions from 10to lo-' M (28), acidification from pH 5 to pH 2 (32), presence of 0.5 M GdnHCl(l1) etc.]. A relatively weak perturbation of variables leads to a shift in the T w D t t M equilibria, indicating low stability (small AGdis) of the oligomeric structures [dilution of the enzyme solutions from 10to lo-' M (28), acidification from pH 5 to pH 2 (32), presence of 0.5 M GdnHCl(l1) etc.].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My first readings were: his excellent review on “Thermodynamic Analysis of Multicomponent Solutions”15 together with Tanford's classical textbook “Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules.”16 This was the time when we studied the association–dissociation equilibrium of enzymes as a function of solvent environment and binding of ligands. The objects of this study were: GAPDH and LDH, both oligomeric allosteric enzymes 17–19. This work was very much related to the analysis performed in Heini's laboratory on glutamate dehydrogenase by Emil Reisler20–22 with the same methodological arsenal which was used by us.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%