1984
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90149-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation of asymmetric ∑9, ∑27a and ∑81d 〈110〉 tilt boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3j, the (1 1 I)( 1 15) ATGB dissociates into triangular regions bounded by two (1 1 I)( 1 1 1) coherent twins and one (1 12)( 1 12) incoherent twin. This dissociation of the C = 9 into C = 3 boundaries has been reported earlier by several authors (Clarebrough and Forwood 1980, Forwood and Clarebrough 1984, Goodhew et al 1978, Krakow and Smith 1986 and is quite remarkable, since the planar (1 1 I)( 1 15) ATGB has the lowest (LJ) or second lowest (EAM) energy and is also the C = 9 GB with the smallest planar unit cell. However, if the total energy of the dissociated boundary is added up and normalized to the planar, undissociated interface area, one finds, using the C3 GB energies in the table, a total energy per unit area of 347mJm-' and 573mJm-', respectively, for the EAM and LJ potentials.…”
Section: Grain-boundary Structures and Relaxationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…3j, the (1 1 I)( 1 15) ATGB dissociates into triangular regions bounded by two (1 1 I)( 1 1 1) coherent twins and one (1 12)( 1 12) incoherent twin. This dissociation of the C = 9 into C = 3 boundaries has been reported earlier by several authors (Clarebrough and Forwood 1980, Forwood and Clarebrough 1984, Goodhew et al 1978, Krakow and Smith 1986 and is quite remarkable, since the planar (1 1 I)( 1 15) ATGB has the lowest (LJ) or second lowest (EAM) energy and is also the C = 9 GB with the smallest planar unit cell. However, if the total energy of the dissociated boundary is added up and normalized to the planar, undissociated interface area, one finds, using the C3 GB energies in the table, a total energy per unit area of 347mJm-' and 573mJm-', respectively, for the EAM and LJ potentials.…”
Section: Grain-boundary Structures and Relaxationssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It seems that a match of the (1 1 5) and (1 1 1) planes at the interface gives a 'lock structure' for displacement of the upper crystal relative to the lower crystal along certain directions (see figure 11 and the discussion there). In this case, the It is worth mentioning that, dissociation of the 9 [1 1 0]-tilt (1 1 5)/(1 1 1) asymmetric tilt GB into a triangular prism bounded by two coherent twin boundaries and a 3 (11 2) symmetric tilt GB has already been observed experimentally in the annealed bulk polycrystal sample of a Cu alloy [50]. The triangular prism observed in that work is quite similar to the ones shown in figures 8(b) and (d).…”
Section: Al By Comparing Figure 6 With Figure 5 (And Also the Curvesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The dissociation of a planar GB into two or more GBs must be associated with a lowering of the GB free energy. It is well known from TEM observations that triangular regions are often formed in C = 9 GBs in fcc metals (Clarebrough and Forwood, 1980;Forwood and Clarebrough, 1984;. Figure 7A shows a sequence of such features along a (1 15) (1 11) facet in Au.…”
Section: Grain Boundary Dissociationsmentioning
confidence: 85%