2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701309104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness

Abstract: We used functional MRI and the anesthetic agent propofol to assess the relationship among neural responses to speech, successful comprehension, and conscious awareness. Volunteers were scanned while listening to sentences containing ambiguous words, matched sentences without ambiguous words, and signalcorrelated noise (SCN). During three scanning sessions, participants were nonsedated (awake), lightly sedated (a slowed response to conversation), and deeply sedated (no conversational response, rousable by loud … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
175
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
29
175
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, perisylvian language areas in the left STS and inferior frontal gyrus demonstrated a temporally invariant response profile up to ϳ40% compression, followed by a sudden collapse. These results confirm an association of language intelligibility with the left perisylvian inferior frontal gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus (Davis and Johnsrude, 2003;Davis et al, 2007), including for compressed speech (Poldrack et al, 2001;Peelle et al, 2004Peelle et al, , 2010Adank and Devlin, 2010). Adank et al (2010) found that, as subjects adapt to compressed speech, activation increases in bilateral superior temporal and midline premotor cortices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, perisylvian language areas in the left STS and inferior frontal gyrus demonstrated a temporally invariant response profile up to ϳ40% compression, followed by a sudden collapse. These results confirm an association of language intelligibility with the left perisylvian inferior frontal gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus (Davis and Johnsrude, 2003;Davis et al, 2007), including for compressed speech (Poldrack et al, 2001;Peelle et al, 2004Peelle et al, , 2010Adank and Devlin, 2010). Adank et al (2010) found that, as subjects adapt to compressed speech, activation increases in bilateral superior temporal and midline premotor cortices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Firstly, fMRI evidence suggests that some patients might retain near-normal levels of language comprehension [36][37][38]. In addition, they appear to be able to selectively attend to and process their own names as compared to unfamiliar names [39][40][41] This finding has been confirmed with EEG data: ERPs evoked by increased mismatch negativity (MMN) have been observed when some patients with DoC heard their own names presented infrequently amongst tones and other names [42].…”
Section: P3-based Bcissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, a previous study of Perrin et al, 2006) showed a larger amplitude in response to the patients' own name as compared to unfamiliar names in all controls but also in 3 out 5 patients diagnosed as being in a vegetative state. Furthermore, it is known that speech processing can be observed in unconscious state such as anesthesia (Davis et al, 2007) or sleep (Perrin et al, 1999). Therefore, responses observed during passive listening conditions probably reflect automatic speech processing and are not sufficient to suggest voluntary and therefore conscious brain activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%