2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociating congruence effects in letters versus shapes: Kanji and kana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, literates of the same ethnicity differentiated between letters and non-letters, just as groups of skilled readers of other ethnicities did (Lachmann and van Leeuwen, 2004; Jincho et al, 2008). They also showed a letter superiority effect that, not surprisingly, is absent in illiterates: letters are processed faster than non-letters and produce opposite congruence effects: positive congruence effects for non-letters, negative congruence effects for letters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, literates of the same ethnicity differentiated between letters and non-letters, just as groups of skilled readers of other ethnicities did (Lachmann and van Leeuwen, 2004; Jincho et al, 2008). They also showed a letter superiority effect that, not surprisingly, is absent in illiterates: letters are processed faster than non-letters and produce opposite congruence effects: positive congruence effects for non-letters, negative congruence effects for letters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since mean RTs of illiterates were nearly entirely outside the range of those of normal adult readers (Lachmann and van Leeuwen, 2004, 2008b; van Leeuwen and Lachmann, 2004; Jincho et al, 2008), ANOVAs were run for each group separately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Nakamura and colleagues reported a difference in the VWFA for Japanese Kana (a regular syllable script) and Kanji (a logographic script) in native Japanese [41], as it has been shown that Kana is more frequently used than Kanji [42]. However, it has also been suggested that compared with Kana, the more holistic processing of Kanji may have contributed to the observed differences [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The flanker studies, in which the visual angle was between 2.6 and 3.5 for the targets, and between 5.2 and 8° for their irrelevant surroundings ( Lachmann and van Leeuwen, 2004 , 2007 , 2008a , b ; van Leeuwen and Lachmann, 2004 ; Jincho et al, 2008 ), offer insight in the question why normal readers would adopt an analytic mode for letter discrimination in reading. In distinguishing letters, component features are important rather than their global shape distinctions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%