2006
DOI: 10.1021/jm060302x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociated Nonsteroidal Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulators; Discovery of the Agonist Trigger in a Tetrahydronaphthalene−Benzoxazine Series

Abstract: The tetrahydronaphthalene-benzoxazine glucocorticoid receptor (GR) partial agonist 4b was optimized to produce potent full agonists of GR. Aromatic ring substitution of the tetrahydronaphthalene leads to weak GR antagonists. Discovery of an "agonist trigger" substituent on the saturated ring of the tetrahydronaphthalene leads to increased potency and efficacious GR agonism. These compounds are efficacy selective in an NFkB GR agonist assay (representing transrepression effects) over an MMTV GR agonist assay (r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compounds described to date have been both steroidal (20) and nonsteroidal (19,21,22) and have various activities that suggest a separation from steroidal side effects (5). Strong in vivo separation between efficacy and side effects is generally lacking in the published literature with a few exceptions: Schacke et al (23) published separation in vivo for topical application, and Coghlan et al (5,6,21,22,24) published separation between efficacy and side effects in vivo after oral administration. Others have published various nonsteroidal compounds with interesting activity in vitro (25)(26)(27) and some demonstrating antiinflammatory activity in vivo, but no side-effect data (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds described to date have been both steroidal (20) and nonsteroidal (19,21,22) and have various activities that suggest a separation from steroidal side effects (5). Strong in vivo separation between efficacy and side effects is generally lacking in the published literature with a few exceptions: Schacke et al (23) published separation in vivo for topical application, and Coghlan et al (5,6,21,22,24) published separation between efficacy and side effects in vivo after oral administration. Others have published various nonsteroidal compounds with interesting activity in vitro (25)(26)(27) and some demonstrating antiinflammatory activity in vivo, but no side-effect data (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with RU24858, numerous steroidal and nonsteroidal ligands of GR show various degrees of dissociated function based on standard reporter assays (Elmore et al, 2001(Elmore et al, , 2004Shah and Scanlan, 2004;De Bosscher et al, 2005;Barker et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2006a). Although a number of these compounds show anti-inflammatory activity, detailed descriptions with respect to inducible genes or side effects are not reported.…”
Section: Gr Ligands and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis that the active and repressive functions of GR are responsible for negative side effects and anti-inflammatory effects, respectively, has led to the discovery of a number of interesting compounds (2,3,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, accumulating evidence suggests that the transcriptional repression by GR alone does not fully account for the repression of inflammatory genes (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%