2003
DOI: 10.1038/nature01930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation

Abstract: Historically, the term 'memory consolidation' refers to a process whereby a memory becomes increasingly resistant to interference from competing or disrupting factors with the continued passage of time. Recent findings regarding the learning of skilled sensory and motor tasks ('procedural learning') have refined this definition, suggesting that consolidation can be more strictly determined by time spent in specific brain states such as wake, sleep or certain stages of sleep. There is also renewed interest in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

70
902
17
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 906 publications
(1,004 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
70
902
17
14
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects within the first few hours are consistent with the neuroscience of memory, which indicates that memory remains susceptible to interference after initial encoding (e.g. initial viewing of a trauma film) while the memory trace continues to consolidate into LTM with up to 6 h of delay (Nader, 2003; Walker, Brakefield, Hobson, & Stickgold, 2003). Emerging research suggests that during this post‐encoding period, newly acquired memory traces spontaneously reactivate or ‘replay’, promoting its gradual and persistent consolidation into LTM (Staresina, Alink, Kriegeskorte, & Henson, 2013).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These effects within the first few hours are consistent with the neuroscience of memory, which indicates that memory remains susceptible to interference after initial encoding (e.g. initial viewing of a trauma film) while the memory trace continues to consolidate into LTM with up to 6 h of delay (Nader, 2003; Walker, Brakefield, Hobson, & Stickgold, 2003). Emerging research suggests that during this post‐encoding period, newly acquired memory traces spontaneously reactivate or ‘replay’, promoting its gradual and persistent consolidation into LTM (Staresina, Alink, Kriegeskorte, & Henson, 2013).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Interestingly, the memory reconsolidation literature suggests that even established memories become labile again upon reactivation from LTM and need to re‐stabilize and reconsolidate to persist (Nader, 2003; Nader, Schafe, & Le Doux, 2000; Walker et al, 2003). Therefore, the effects of Tetris on intrusive memories could be observed after any length of post‐encoding delay in principle, as long as the memory is labile and thus amenable to interference, for example, as has been tested 24 h or more after encoding (James et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Müller & Pilzecker, 1900; Nadel, Hupbach, Gomez, & Newman-Smith, 2012). This consolidation period takes up to six hours (Nader, 2003) and during this period the memory trace is still labile and vulnerable to interference (Nader, 2003; Walker, Brakefield, Hobson, & Stickgold, 2003). It has been proposed that tasks taxing the working memory (WM) shortly after initial learning (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memories are malleable during the consolidation phase, which is thought to end after approximately six hours (Nader, 2003; Walker, Brakefield, Hobson, & Stickgold, 2003). The memory is then proposed to be stable, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%