2016
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociable Effects of Cocaine Dependence on Reward Processes: The Role of Acute Cocaine and Craving

Abstract: The relative impact of chronic vs acute cocaine on dependence-related variability in reward processing in cocaine-dependent individuals (CD) is not well understood, despite the relevance of such effects to long-term outcomes. To dissociate these effects, CD (N = 15) and healthy controls (HC; N = 15) underwent MRI two times while performing a monetary incentive delay task. Both scans were identical across subjects/groups, except that, in a single-blind, counterbalanced design, CD received intravenous cocaine (3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merged data of cocaine dependent individuals and controls showed an effect of punishment magnitude in the sensorimotor cortex, with less activity for small losses, compared with medium and large losses. Controls alone exhibited the least activity for medium losses, implying that the low response to small losses was driven by cocaine dependent individuals (Rose et al, 2017). While these results initially imply a more appropriate comparative response to low punishments in cocaine dependent individuals, they may reflect overall lower punishment sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merged data of cocaine dependent individuals and controls showed an effect of punishment magnitude in the sensorimotor cortex, with less activity for small losses, compared with medium and large losses. Controls alone exhibited the least activity for medium losses, implying that the low response to small losses was driven by cocaine dependent individuals (Rose et al, 2017). While these results initially imply a more appropriate comparative response to low punishments in cocaine dependent individuals, they may reflect overall lower punishment sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the present results demonstrated that SDIs' attenuated d/pgACC response following negative feedback occurred only when variance associated with prior behavior (and thus behavioral expectancies) was fully controlled. This effect is subtle, but may provide clarification to a nascent, and currently inconsistent, literature ( Parvaz et al, 2015 ; Patel et al, 2013 ; Rose et al, 2017 ). By controlling for expectancy effects, the task affords a pure measure of sensitivity to the mere presentation of negative feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“… Patel et al (2013) failed to find cocaine-related dACC reductions during either phase of a MID task. Similarly, Rose et al (2017) failed to find any differences in dACC in cocaine users compared to controls, but did report reduced reward outcome-related responses in the right habenula in cocaine users. In contrast, a third study reported that cocaine-dependent individuals showed electrophysiological evidence of reduced sensitivity to unexpected, but not expected, error feedback on a gambling-type task ( Parvaz et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is in line with human data reporting brain hypo-functionality in cocaine addicts 4 , 5 , 20 , 21 , 30 , 68 , 69 . Cerebral hypoactivity has also been suggested as a biomarker of cocaine addiction as it is associated with reduced ability to experience reward 6 , 7 and control impulses 9 , 10 . It may also predict relapse risk 11 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a hypoactive brain state in addicted patients compared to healthy control has been demonstrated by functional neuroimaging studies 4 , 5 . In fact, brain hypoactivity is a suggested biomarker of cocaine addiction as it is associated with reduced ability to experience reward 6 , 7 and reduced ability to control impulses 8 10 . Brain hypoactivity also predicts relapse in abstinent patients and is as such seen as a determinant of relapse risk 11 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%