2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00083-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociable brain regions process object meaning and object structure during picture naming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
69
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our finding of more activity in the middle temporal gyrus for Americans and in the fusiform for East Asians, Whatmough, Chertkow, Murtha, and Hanratty (2002) have proposed a distinction between the roles of the middle temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus. They found that both regions were activated by an animal-naming task, but only left middle temporal activations varied as a function of the participants' familiarity with the animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with our finding of more activity in the middle temporal gyrus for Americans and in the fusiform for East Asians, Whatmough, Chertkow, Murtha, and Hanratty (2002) have proposed a distinction between the roles of the middle temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus. They found that both regions were activated by an animal-naming task, but only left middle temporal activations varied as a function of the participants' familiarity with the animals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They found that both regions were activated by an animal-naming task, but only left middle temporal activations varied as a function of the participants' familiarity with the animals. On the basis of this finding and the response of the fusiform to perceptual processing of "possible" nonsense objects, which by definition do not contain semantic information (Martin et al, 1996), Whatmough et al (2002) suggested that the fusiform gyrus is involved in the structural processing of complex configurations or distinct perceptual aspects (such as the scene backgrounds in the present study), rather than semantic features of objects. Using this framework, our findings suggest that Westerners engage the middle temporal gyrus more than do East Asians to accomplish semantic processing of complex scenes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In other functional imaging studies, activation of this region has been associated with recognizing the meaning of an object (Whatmough et al, 2002), recognizing images of the human body (Downing et al, 2001), listening to complex sentences (Michael et al, 2001), and visual recognition of speech (Bernstein et al, 2002). The present study indicates that treated smokers may have been more able to attend to these aspects of the cigarette cue video (which had several scenes of subjects conversing while smoking) than untreated smokers (who may have been focused on urge to smoke during the cigarette cue video).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although task difficulty has been operationalized in various ways, increased activation in IFG has been associated with increased difficulty across these definitions. In a PET study in which high-and low-familiarity objects were overtly named, increased activation across inferior (BA 45/47) and middle (BA 10) frontal gyri was identified in the low-familiarity (i.e., high difficulty) condition (Whatmough, Chertkow, Murtha, & Hanratty, 2002). Thompson-Schill, D'Esposito, Aguirre, and Farah (1997) and Thompson-Schill, D'Esposito, and Kan (1999) used word-generation paradigms given a base word, where the amount of inhibitory effort (selection demands) needed to generate an appropriate item was varied.…”
Section: Parametric Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%