2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.090502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipative Preparation of Entanglement in Optical Cavities

Abstract: We propose a novel scheme for the preparation of a maximally entangled state of two atoms in an optical cavity. Starting from an arbitrary initial state, a singlet state is prepared as the unique fixed point of a dissipative quantum dynamical process. In our scheme, cavity decay is no longer undesirable, but plays an integral part in the dynamics. As a result, we get a qualitative improvement in the scaling of the fidelity with the cavity parameters. Our analysis indicates that dissipative state preparation is… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
375
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(380 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
375
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the L k 's are the so-called Lindblad operators [26]. The five Lindblad operators governing dissipation in the two-atom model are (28) where κ is the decay of the cavity and Γ i (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) are the spontaneous emissions of atoms.…”
Section: Shortcuts To Adiabatic Passage For the Fast Populations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the L k 's are the so-called Lindblad operators [26]. The five Lindblad operators governing dissipation in the two-atom model are (28) where κ is the decay of the cavity and Γ i (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) are the spontaneous emissions of atoms.…”
Section: Shortcuts To Adiabatic Passage For the Fast Populations mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, entanglement is a property that is hard to reach technologically and even when achieved, it is a very unstable quantum state, vulnerable under the effects of decoherence, any dissipative process as a result of the coupling to environment. Conventionally these effects are considered mainly destructive for entanglement, nevertheless some recent studies of this subject attest results different from the common conviction, even appearing as counterintuitive at first glance [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main difference between the two schemes is that in Ref. [45] the cavity resonance is assumed to be far detuned from the atomic resonance, while in the present approach the two resonances are the same. Thus they operate in qualitatively different regimes of cavity QED.…”
Section: Supplemental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare the singlet state |S = |gs − |sg we use a similar approach to Ref. [45] whereby the singlet state is engineered to be the steady state of a driven, dissipative evolution. We take a separation n such that cos q * r n = 1 andρ…”
Section: Fig 1: A)mentioning
confidence: 99%