2022
DOI: 10.1111/aec.13196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipation of seabird‐derived nutrients in a terrestrial insular trophic web

Abstract: Highly mobile organisms can transport nutrients and energy among distinct ecosystems, such as between oceanic foraging areas and terrestrial breeding sites. Seabirds are great nutrient carriers and potentially play a key role in the maintenance of trophic webs on islands. In this study, we assessed three dimensions of marine nutrient dissipation-horizontal, temporal and vertical-on the tropical Meio Island of Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Brazil. For this, C 3 and C 4 plants, ants and spiders found in a 100… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling soils within the seabird colony resulted in soil samples mixed with dry guano that had apparently not yet been mineralized, which therefore could explain the lower δ 15 N in soils observed in colony sites, especially on Santa B arbara Island. This must have had a larger impact on our results because none of the control areas were truly free of seabird influence, whereas it seems that, in some other studies (e.g., Caut et al, 2012;Gaiotto et al, 2022), sampling conditions allowed a clearer distinction of areas with and without seabird influence.…”
Section: Effects Of Seabirds On the Terrestrial Food Webmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sampling soils within the seabird colony resulted in soil samples mixed with dry guano that had apparently not yet been mineralized, which therefore could explain the lower δ 15 N in soils observed in colony sites, especially on Santa B arbara Island. This must have had a larger impact on our results because none of the control areas were truly free of seabird influence, whereas it seems that, in some other studies (e.g., Caut et al, 2012;Gaiotto et al, 2022), sampling conditions allowed a clearer distinction of areas with and without seabird influence.…”
Section: Effects Of Seabirds On the Terrestrial Food Webmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although both seabird colonies had higher soil nutrient concentrations than the control site, soil macro‐ and inorganic nutrient levels were higher in the tern colony than in the red‐footed booby colony. This is linked to the higher nest density of terns (Table S1) but it may also be influenced by the terns being ground‐nesters, in contrast to the tree‐nesting habits of red‐footed boobies (Gaiotto et al., 2022). Furthermore, the red‐footed booby colony's presence on South Island is relatively recent (ICS, unpublished data), in contrast to the long‐established tern colony, where nutrients have accumulated over several decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…but it may also be influenced by the terns being ground-nesters, in contrast to the tree-nesting habits of red-footed boobies (Gaiotto et al, 2022). Furthermore, the red-footed booby colony's presence on South Island is relatively recent (ICS, unpublished data), in contrast to the long-established tern colony, where nutrients have accumulated over several decades.…”
Section: Nutrient Levels In Terrestrial and Nearshore Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is linked to the higher nest density of terns (Table S1) and nesting location (Smith et al, 2011). Nutrients from tree-nesters, like red-footed boobies, are more sparsely distributed and less likely to reach the soil compared to ground-nesters (Gaiotto et al, 2022). Furthermore, the red-footed booby colony’s presence on South Island is relatively recent (ICS, unpubl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%