1986
DOI: 10.1021/jf00069a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipation of captan residues from cherry and peach fruits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported previously (Smith and MacHardy 1984;Frank et al 1985;1987;Northover et al 1986), there was a significant loss of captan due to wash-off by rain. The relationships between the loss and the amount of rainfall varied greatly between experiments and fields.…”
Section: Model Parameters For Captansupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As reported previously (Smith and MacHardy 1984;Frank et al 1985;1987;Northover et al 1986), there was a significant loss of captan due to wash-off by rain. The relationships between the loss and the amount of rainfall varied greatly between experiments and fields.…”
Section: Model Parameters For Captansupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Several previous studies reported that there was no appreciable loss of captan on tomato fruit (Frank et al 1987), apple and grape (Frank et al 1985), and cherry and peach (Northover et al 1986) under dry conditions. However, large loss of captan was shown under dry conditions in another field study (Smith and MacHardy 1984), which may have resulted from heavy dew.…”
Section: Model Parameters For Captanmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Captan, a protectant fungicide [ N ‐(trichloromethylthio)cyclohex‐4‐ene‐1,2‐dicarboximide], is one of the most important fungicides used to control apple scab, particularly when apple mildew is not severe. Captan is also widely used to control diseases in many other crops 8–10. Many studies have been conducted to investigate captan residues on various crops in relation to physiological and physical factors in laboratory, storage or field conditions 6, 8, 11–13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%