2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00049-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium and responsible microorganisms in two Chinese and Australian paddy soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
58
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Tobias et al, (2001) and Yin et al, (2002) claimed that NH 4 + -N generated from DNRA was mainly immobilized in the soil ON pool, while Scott The characteristics of soil N concentrations along time were in line with some previous investigations (Yin et al, 2002;Scott et al, 2008;Lu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Relative Potential Of Soil Dnrasupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Tobias et al, (2001) and Yin et al, (2002) claimed that NH 4 + -N generated from DNRA was mainly immobilized in the soil ON pool, while Scott The characteristics of soil N concentrations along time were in line with some previous investigations (Yin et al, 2002;Scott et al, 2008;Lu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Relative Potential Of Soil Dnrasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As soon as the pre-incubation After all amendments were added, the flasks were immediately incubated in the dark at 25 o C. It is generally believed that DNRA is a fast process (Yin et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2013). In order to make our investigation comparable to previous ones, 12 h and 24 h were …”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ratio of the moles of N 2 produced to the moles of NO 3 Ϫ removed decreased down the estuary, while the ratio of the moles of NH 4 ϩ produced to the moles of NO 3 Ϫ removed increased (Table 1), indicating a decrease in the potential for DN and an increase in the potential for DNRA down the estuary. This change in the relative significance of DN and DNRA has been attributed previously (4,12,16,48) to increases in the ratio of electron donors to electron acceptors in soils or sediments, which stimulate DNRA relative to DN, and in the present case is due probably to the decrease in nitrate concentrations in the water column toward the mouth of the estuary. There is currently no way of directly measuring available organic matter within sediments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%