2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissimilatory iron and sulfate reduction by native microbial communities using lactate and citrate as carbon sources and electron donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Queiroz et al (2018) reported a significant correlation between Fe, Pb and other trace metals in tailing deposits after the initial impacts in the Rio Doce estuary in 2015. The iron oxides from tailings deposited in the estuary have a strong capacity of metal retention (Cornell and Schwertmann 2003;Yin et al 2016); and they are likely to be released due dissimilatory iron reduction under estuarine conditions (Bonneville et al 2009;Queiroz et al, 2018;Xia et al 2019). Although anoxic estuarine soils favor the formation of sulfides (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Queiroz et al (2018) reported a significant correlation between Fe, Pb and other trace metals in tailing deposits after the initial impacts in the Rio Doce estuary in 2015. The iron oxides from tailings deposited in the estuary have a strong capacity of metal retention (Cornell and Schwertmann 2003;Yin et al 2016); and they are likely to be released due dissimilatory iron reduction under estuarine conditions (Bonneville et al 2009;Queiroz et al, 2018;Xia et al 2019). Although anoxic estuarine soils favor the formation of sulfides (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By acid dissolution of the precipitate in the effluent, Fe(II) and Fe(III) were found in the precipitate and the content of Fe(III) was less. It was proved that the precipitate was mainly FeS with a small amount of ferric hydroxide precipitate [26,27,39]. According to the analysis of sulfide concentration change at this stage, it is inferred that the main process is the oxidation-reduction reaction between Fe(III) and sulfide to form Fe(II) and elemental sulfur, accompanied by the formation of a small amount of FeS precipitation.…”
Section: Conversion Analysis Of Fe Elementsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chen et al found that many sulfides produced by sulfate reduction existed in the form of hydrogen sulfide in simultaneous removal of SO 2 and NO in a rotating drum biofilter [9,10]. Both Zhou et al [26] and Xia et al [27] observed the formation of FeS in the sulfate reduction system containing ferric iron. When the sulfate concentration was increased to 25 mM, the sulfate removal efficiency was more affected and would take a long time to recover to more than 90%.…”
Section: Simultaneous Biological and Chemical Removal Of Sulfate And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the source of the sulfate in the deployed Fe(III)-coated pumice slurries is most likely from the spring water well. Oxoanions such as sulfate can potentially be adsorbed and accumulated onto the surface of Fe(III) minerals (Hinkle et al, 2015) and could co-exist to enhance sequential Fe(III)-sulfate reduction (Xia et al, 2019). This may explain why the Fe(III)-coating (dominated by akaganeite) on the pumice surface facilitated the sorption of sulfate from spring water (contributing to sulfate concentrations up to ∼16 mg/L).…”
Section: Geochemical Changes During the Incubation Of The Deployed "Mmentioning
confidence: 99%