1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4405(84)90053-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissertation research in school psychology, 1978–1980

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our review of the literature showed an absence of this information, in stark contrast to related fields, such as school psychology (French & Raykovitz, 1984;Ysseldyke & Pickholtz, 1975). In this investigation, we asked the following questions about dissertation research in special education: …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our review of the literature showed an absence of this information, in stark contrast to related fields, such as school psychology (French & Raykovitz, 1984;Ysseldyke & Pickholtz, 1975). In this investigation, we asked the following questions about dissertation research in special education: …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consider, for example, that most of the major surveys of researchers and/or practitioners in the school psychology field have not addressed the issue of what methodological strategies should be used to advance knowl edge in the field. Studies have focused on a review of disser tation topics (French & Roykovitz, 1984;Ysseldyke & Pickholtz, 1975), analysis of the contents of the major school psychology journals (O'Callaghan, 1974; Reynolds & Clark, 1984), and an analysis of future research needs of researchers and practitioners (Strein, 1987). Little is said about what methodology will address specific areas of need.…”
Section: Philosophical Objections To Single-case Research Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Doctoral theses or dissertations (“thesis” and “dissertation” are used interchangeably in this study) not only reveal the interest and experience of doctoral students (and their advisors) but also provide insights into the level of sophistication of research in a particular field or discipline (Adams & White, 1994; Das & Handfield, 1997; Lekwa & Ysseldyke, 2010). In addition, they help identify areas where research activity is limited and thus outline directions for future research (French & Raykovitz, 1984). This is because doctoral students are generally considered capable of synthesizing a substantial amount of literature and filling in gaps in a body of knowledge (Jack, Stephens, & Evans, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ysseldyke and Pickholtz (1975), who sought to supplement Tindall’s (1968) baseline data, found that relatively equal research attention was given to assessment-evaluation, education methodology, and social-educational issues but significant differences were seen in the other categories. French and Raykovitz (1984) then provided an updated view of the trends that had taken place in school psychology dissertations. A survey was sent to directors of American and Canadian doctoral programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation