1966
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(66)90120-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissemination of organism-bearing droplets by high-speed dental drills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacterial count was increased during the cavity preparation [32,35] and the length of the procedure was proportional to the amount expelled [35]. These findings drew attention to the possibility of cross-infection of airborne diseases when using high speed hand pieces [36][37][38]. As mentioned in the introduction section there is a positive correlation between indoor PM2.5 (<2.5 µm) and the presence of bronchitis and asthmatic symptoms [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial count was increased during the cavity preparation [32,35] and the length of the procedure was proportional to the amount expelled [35]. These findings drew attention to the possibility of cross-infection of airborne diseases when using high speed hand pieces [36][37][38]. As mentioned in the introduction section there is a positive correlation between indoor PM2.5 (<2.5 µm) and the presence of bronchitis and asthmatic symptoms [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both immunosuppressed and infected patients may be treated in a multichair dental clinic, my data raise the question of whether all patients should be treated in closed operatories rather than in the wide-open clinics commonly found in dental schools. My investigation differed from previous investigations (5,8,10,12,14) in that the numbers of microbes in dental aerosols were determined by using a slit type of biological air sampler and culture plates were incubated in an anaerobic chamber. Anaerobic conditions were used because this study was designed to quantify oral bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In previous studies, investigators have described increases in bacterial air contamination following dental treatments in closed dental operatories (5,8,10,12,14). However, in most of these studies the researchers used procedures or conditions that were not ideal for accurate quantification of bacterial aerosols arising from oral cavities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] At a normal working distance, there is no area of safety from organism carrying droplets. [11] and bacteria may remain in suspension in the air for up to half minute . [12] There is a risk that the protective mechanisms of the eye may be overwhelmed by such high concentrations of pathogen.. [10] In developing countries, it has been observed that the level of knowledge regarding eye diseases in general is inadequate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%