2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissemination of cooking energy alternatives in India—a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the traditional stoves and fuel wood are still preferred due to economic reasons (Kanagawa and Nakata 2007) for cooking, water heating, space heating, lighting, livestock rearing, etc. Among various activities, cooking requires relatively more energy (Pohekar et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional stoves and fuel wood are still preferred due to economic reasons (Kanagawa and Nakata 2007) for cooking, water heating, space heating, lighting, livestock rearing, etc. Among various activities, cooking requires relatively more energy (Pohekar et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…consumer demand experiments | technology adoption | development economics B iomass combustion with traditional cookstoves is the primary cause in developing countries of indoor air pollution (1), a major global health hazard (1)(2)(3)(4). A conservative estimate suggests that exposure to indoor smoke produced by household solidfuel combustion is responsible for nearly 3% of the global disease burden and 4% of the disease burden in the high-mortality developing regions of the world (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy used for cooking accounts for 92 % of the gross energy consumption in poor, urban households in Maharastra, and the demand for cooking energy is increasing annually (19) . Pohekar et al (19) was therefore identified as an area of interest. Exploration of underlying determinants of household food security is essential for better targeting interventions that can improve household food security (15) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%